Modeling data from double-tagging experiments to estimate heterogeneous rates of tag shedding in lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush)

被引:25
作者
Fabrizio, MC
Nichols, JD
Hines, JE
Swanson, BL
Schram, ST
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Great Lakes Sci Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Res Ctr, Laurel, MD 20708 USA
[3] Wisconsin Dept Nat Resources, Bayfield, WI 54814 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1139/cjfas-56-8-1409
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Data from mark-recapture studies are used to estimate population rates such as exploitation, survival, and growth. Many of these applications assume negligible tag loss, so tag shedding can be a significant problem. Various tag shedding models have been developed for use with data from double-tagging experiments, including models to estimate constant instantaneous rates, time-dependent rates, and type I and II shedding rates. In this study, we used conditional (on recaptures) multinomial models implemented using the program SURVIV (G.C. White. 1983. J. Wildl. Manage. 47: 716-728) to estimate tag shedding rates of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) and explore various potential sources of variation in these rates. We applied the models to data from several long-term double-tagging experiments with Lake Superior lake trout and estimated shedding rates for anchor tags in hatchery-reared and wild fish and for various tag types applied in these experiments. Estimates of annual tag retention rates for lake trout were fairly high (80-90%), but we found evidence (among wild fish only) that retention rates may be significantly lower in the first year due to type I losses. Annual retention rates for some tag types varied between male and female fish, but there was no consistent pattern across years. Our estimates of annual tag retention rates will be used in future studies of survival rates for these fish.
引用
收藏
页码:1409 / 1419
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   AIC MODEL SELECTION IN OVERDISPERSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA [J].
ANDERSON, DR ;
BURNHAM, KP ;
WHITE, GC .
ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (06) :1780-1793
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, ESTIMATION ANIMAL AB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1965, I-A TROP TUNA COMM B
[4]   BIAS AND LOSS OF PRECISION DUE TO TAG LOSS IN JOLLY-SEBER ESTIMATES FOR MARK-RECAPTURE EXPERIMENTS [J].
ARNASON, AN ;
MILLS, KH .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1981, 38 (09) :1077-1095
[5]  
BAGLIN RE, 1980, FISH B-NOAA, V78, P179
[6]   Estimating tag-shedding rates for experiments with multiple tag types [J].
Barrowman, NJ ;
Myers, RA .
BIOMETRICS, 1996, 52 (04) :1410-1416
[7]  
Bayliff W. H., 1972, INTERAM TROP TUNA CO, V15, P439
[8]  
Beverton R.J. H., 1993, On the Dynamics of Exploited fish Populations
[9]  
Brewin M. Kerry, 1995, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V15, P881, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(1995)015<0881:DLOFAT>2.3.CO
[10]  
2