Mass determination of moment magnitudes M w and establishing the relationship between M w and M L for moderate and small Kamchatka earthquakes

被引:16
作者
Abubakirov, I. R. [1 ]
Gusev, A. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guseva, E. M. [1 ]
Pavlov, V. M. [1 ]
Skorkina, A. A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Kamchatka Branch, Geophys Survey, Petropavlovsk Kamchatski 683006, Russia
[2] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Volcanol & Seismol, Far Eastern Branch, Petropavlovsk Kamchatski 683006, Russia
[3] Russian Acad Sci, Schmidt Inst Phys Earth, Moscow 123242, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
earthquake; magnitude; regional magnitude M-L; seismic moment M-0; moment magnitude M-w; Kamchatka; GROUND MOTION; SIMULATION; ATTENUATION; ENVELOPE; SPECTRA; STRESS; TENSOR; EARTH;
D O I
10.1134/S1069351318010019
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The average relationship is established between the basic magnitude for the Kamchatka regional catalog, M (L) , and modern moment magnitude M (w). The latter is firmly tied to the value of the source seismic moment M (0) which has a direct physical meaning. M (L) magnitude is not self-reliant but is obtained through the conversion of the traditional Fedotov's S-wave energy class, K (S1,2) (F68) . Installation of the digital seismographic network in Kamchatka in 2006-2010 permitted mass estimates of M (0) and M (w) to be obtained from the regional data. In this paper we outline a number of techniques to estimate M (0) for the Kamchatka earthquakes using the waveforms of regional stations, and then compare the obtained M (w) estimates with each other and with M (L) , based on several hundred earthquakes that took place in 2010-2014. On the average, for M (w) = 3.0-6.0, M (w) = M (L) -0.40; this relationship allows obtaining M (w) estimates (proxy-M (w)) for a large part of the regional earthquake catalog with M (L) = 3.4-6.4 (M (w) = 3.0-6.0).
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 47
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   ESTIMATION OF SCATTERING PROPERTIES OF LITHOSPHERE OF KAMCHATKA BASED ON MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION OF RECORD ENVELOPE OF A NEAR EARTHQUAKE [J].
ABUBAKIROV, IR ;
GUSEV, AA .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 1990, 64 (01) :52-67
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1972, The Energy Classification of Earthquakes and the Magnitude Problem
[3]   Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method [J].
Boore, DM .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2003, 160 (3-4) :635-676
[4]  
BOORE DM, 1984, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V74, P1615
[5]  
Bormann P, 2013, NEW MANUAL SEISMOLOG, P1, DOI 10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2_ch4
[6]  
Bormann P., 2012, NEW MANUAL SEISMOLOG, P1, DOI DOI 10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2_IS_3.3
[7]   TECTONIC STRESS AND SPECTRA OF SEISMIC SHEAR WAVES FROM EARTHQUAKES [J].
BRUNE, JN .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1970, 75 (26) :4997-+
[8]  
Bune V. I., 1955, DOKL AKAD NAUK TADZH, P31
[9]   The system of detailed seismological observations in Kamchatka in 2011 [J].
Chebrov, V. N. ;
Droznin, D. V. ;
Kugaenko, Yu. A. ;
Levina, V. I. ;
Senyukov, S. L. ;
Sergeev, V. A. ;
Shevchenko, Yu. V. ;
Yashchuk, V. V. .
JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND SEISMOLOGY, 2013, 7 (01) :16-36
[10]  
Chebrov V. N., 2016, NAUKI ZEMLE, V29, P5