Numerical simulation of time delay interferometry for eLISA/NGO

被引:20
|
作者
Wang, Gang [1 ]
Ni, Wei-Tou [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Natl Climate Observ, Shenzhen 518040, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Dept Phys, CGC, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[3] Shanghai Normal Univ, SUCA, Shanghai 200234, Peoples R China
关键词
DARK ENERGY; ASTROD; MISSION;
D O I
10.1088/0264-9381/30/6/065011
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
eLISA/NGO is a new gravitational wave detection proposal with arm length of 10(6) km and one interferometer down-scaled from LISA. Just like LISA and ASTROD-GW, in order to attain the requisite sensitivity for eLISA/NGO, laser frequency noise must be suppressed to below the secondary noises such as the optical path noise, acceleration noise, etc. In previous papers, we have performed the numerical simulation of the time delay interferometry (TDI) for LISA and ASTROD-GW with one arm dysfunctional by using the CGC 2.7 ephemeris. The results are well below their respective limits in which the laser frequency noise is required to be suppressed. In this paper, we follow the same procedure to simulate the time delay interferometry numerically. To do this, we work out a set of 1000-day optimized mission orbits of the eLISA/NGO spacecraft starting on 1 January 2021 using the CGC 2.7 ephemeris framework. We then use the numerical method to calculate the residual optical path differences in the second-generation TDI solutions as in our previous papers. The maximum path length difference, for all configurations calculated, is below 13 mm (43 ps). It is well below the limit in which the laser frequency noise is required to be suppressed for eLISA/NGO. We compare and discuss the resulting differences due to the different arm lengths for various mission proposals-eLISA/NGO, an NGO-LISA-type mission with a nominal arm length of 2 x 10(6) km, LISA and ASTROD-GW.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Time-delay interferometry with local delays for TianQin
    Wang, Zhizhao
    Xu, Wencai
    Wu, Kaihang
    Yang, Shuju
    Duan, Huizong
    Du, Yuanbo
    Zhang, Xuefeng
    Yeh, Hsien-Chi
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 110 (08)
  • [42] Doppler effect in TianQin time-delay interferometry
    Zheng, Lu
    Yang, Shutao
    Zhang, Xuefeng
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 108 (02)
  • [43] Time-delay interferometry with optical frequency comb
    Tinto, Massimo
    Yu, Nan
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2015, 92 (04):
  • [44] Arm locking in conjunction with time-delay interferometry
    Wang, Pan-Pan
    Qian, Wei-Liang
    Wu, Han-Zhong
    Tan, Yu-Jie
    Shao, Cheng-Gang
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 106 (10)
  • [45] AN IMPROVED TIME DELAY SIMULATION
    BUDAK, A
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRONIC COMPUTERS, 1966, EC15 (01): : 122 - &
  • [46] Numerical simulation of formation mechanism of multi hole and same delay time of blasting crater
    Wang Peng
    Zhou Chuan-bo
    Geng Xue-feng
    Jia Jian-hong
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2010, 31 (03) : 993 - 997
  • [47] Model-independent time-delay interferometry based
    Baghi, Quentin
    Baker, John
    Slutsky, Jacob
    Thorpe, James Ira
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2021, 104 (12)
  • [48] Modified time-delay interferometry with an optical frequency comb
    Tan, Yu-Jie
    Xu, Ming-Yang
    Wang, Pan-Pan
    Wu, Han-Zhong
    Shao, Cheng-Gang
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 106 (04)
  • [49] Clock noise reduction in geometric time delay interferometry combinations
    Yang, Zi-Jiang
    Wang, Pan-Pan
    Tan, Yu-Jie
    Shao, Cheng-Gang
    RESULTS IN PHYSICS, 2023, 53
  • [50] Sensitivity functions for geometric time-delay interferometry combinations
    Wang, Pan-Pan
    Qian, Wei-Liang
    Wu, Zhang-Qi
    Chen, Hao-Kang
    Huang, Weisheng
    Wu, Han-Zhong
    Tan, Yu-Jie
    Shao, Cheng-Gang
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 108 (04)