Numerical simulation of time delay interferometry for eLISA/NGO

被引:20
|
作者
Wang, Gang [1 ]
Ni, Wei-Tou [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Natl Climate Observ, Shenzhen 518040, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Dept Phys, CGC, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[3] Shanghai Normal Univ, SUCA, Shanghai 200234, Peoples R China
关键词
DARK ENERGY; ASTROD; MISSION;
D O I
10.1088/0264-9381/30/6/065011
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
eLISA/NGO is a new gravitational wave detection proposal with arm length of 10(6) km and one interferometer down-scaled from LISA. Just like LISA and ASTROD-GW, in order to attain the requisite sensitivity for eLISA/NGO, laser frequency noise must be suppressed to below the secondary noises such as the optical path noise, acceleration noise, etc. In previous papers, we have performed the numerical simulation of the time delay interferometry (TDI) for LISA and ASTROD-GW with one arm dysfunctional by using the CGC 2.7 ephemeris. The results are well below their respective limits in which the laser frequency noise is required to be suppressed. In this paper, we follow the same procedure to simulate the time delay interferometry numerically. To do this, we work out a set of 1000-day optimized mission orbits of the eLISA/NGO spacecraft starting on 1 January 2021 using the CGC 2.7 ephemeris framework. We then use the numerical method to calculate the residual optical path differences in the second-generation TDI solutions as in our previous papers. The maximum path length difference, for all configurations calculated, is below 13 mm (43 ps). It is well below the limit in which the laser frequency noise is required to be suppressed for eLISA/NGO. We compare and discuss the resulting differences due to the different arm lengths for various mission proposals-eLISA/NGO, an NGO-LISA-type mission with a nominal arm length of 2 x 10(6) km, LISA and ASTROD-GW.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Numerical Simulation on Selection of Optimal Delay Time for Precise Delay Blasting (vol 2021, 4593221, 2021)
    Ma, Jun
    Li, Xianglong
    Wang, Jianguo
    Li, Qiang
    Zuo, Ting
    Wu, Xiao
    Hou, Meng
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2022, 2022
  • [32] Numerical simulation of ignition mode and ignition delay time of pulverized biomass particles
    Fatehi, Hesameddin
    Weng, Wubin
    Costa, Mario
    Li, Zhongshan
    Rabacal, Miriam
    Alden, Marcus
    Bai, Xue-Song
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2019, 206 : 400 - 410
  • [33] The eLISA/NGO Data Processing Centre
    Beckmann, Volker
    Petiteau, A.
    Porter, E.
    Auger, G.
    Plagnol, E.
    Binetruy, P.
    9TH LISA SYMPOSIUM, 2013, 467 : 325 - 329
  • [34] Time-delay interferometry with onboard optical delays
    Reinhardt, Jan Niklas
    Euringer, Philipp
    Hartwig, Olaf
    Hechenblaikner, Gerald
    Heinzel, Gerhard
    Yamamoto, Kohei
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 110 (08)
  • [35] Time delay interferometry combination with zero-response
    Wang, Pan -Pan
    Lu, Xiao-Yu
    Zhao, Xin-Lei
    Chen, Hao-Kang
    Zhou, Jing
    Huang, Weisheng
    Tan, Yu-Jie
    Wu, Han-Zhong
    Shao, Cheng-Gang
    RESULTS IN PHYSICS, 2024, 58
  • [36] The effects of orbital motion on LISA time delay interferometry
    Cornish, NJ
    Hellings, RW
    CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2003, 20 (22) : 4851 - 4860
  • [37] Time-delay interferometry without clock synchronization
    Hartwig, Olaf
    Bayle, Jean-Baptiste
    Staab, Martin
    Hees, Aurelien
    Lilley, Marc
    Wolf, Peter
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 105 (12)
  • [38] Plasma noise in TianQin time-delay interferometry
    Jing, Yi-De
    Zheng, Lu
    Yang, Shutao
    Zhang, Xuefeng
    Lu, Lingfeng
    Tang, Binbin
    Su, Wei
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 106 (08)
  • [39] Second-generation time-delay interferometry
    Tinto, Massimo
    Dhurandhar, Sanjeev
    Malakar, Dishari
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 107 (08)
  • [40] Higher-order time-delay interferometry
    Tinto, Massimo
    Dhurandhar, Sanjeev
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 108 (08)