A spatial multi-criteria planning scheme for evaluating riparian buffer restoration priorities

被引:21
作者
Zhao, Peng [1 ]
Xia, Beicheng [1 ]
Hu, Yanfang [1 ]
Yang, Yajun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Buffer restoration priorities; Riparian buffers; SWAT model; Non-point source pollution; Multi-criteria analysis; NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; WATER-QUALITY; NITROGEN REMOVAL; LAND-USE; PLACEMENT; SOIL; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.01.037
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Vegetative riparian buffers are considered as key zones in providing natural regulation functions for water quality aimed at intercepting non-point source (NPS) nutrients from upslope areas to surface water. The function for reducing NPS nutrients may perform better in some locations than in others because not all factors affecting nutrient mitigation are equal in all locations. This paper intended to develop a spatial multi-criteria planning scheme involving nutrient export and buffer characteristics to evaluate the buffer restoration priorities. The Liuxihe River basin, located in central Guangdong Province, was used as a case study area for this research. Six indicators, including total nitrogen export, total phosphorous export, mean buffer width, buffer gap ratio, vegetation vigor and soil erodibility, were all integrated to assess priority. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was applied to simulate total nitrogen export and total phosphorous export traveling from upslope areas to the buffer. Other indicators representing the buffer mitigation potential of NPS nutrients were calculated with the help of the Geographic Information System (GIS). To reduce redundancy and objectively discriminate the importance among indicators, a principle component weighting method was used to ascribe weights to each indicator. Total nitrogen export and total phosphorous export, which quantified the NPS nutrients export, were assigned the highest weights of 3.30 and 3.16, respectively. The aggregation result of the multi-criteria analysis generated a distribution map ranking the buffer restoration priorities. The results suggested that restoring the riparian buffers in sub-basins located in the lower reaches of Liuxihe River basin should be a priority. This planning strategy can be applied as a useful supporting tool for water quality management on watershed scale. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 164
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Collaborative Multi-Criteria Spatial Decision Support System for Multifunctional Landscape Evaluation
    Attardi, Raffaele
    Cerreta, Maria
    Poli, Giuliano
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2015, PT III, 2015, 9157 : 782 - 797
  • [32] A Simple, Portable, Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis Shell - MCAS-S
    Hill, Michael J.
    Lesslie, Rob
    Barry, Andrew
    Barry, Simon
    MODSIM 2005: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION: ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND DECISION MAKING: ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2005, : 1532 - 1538
  • [33] Spatial multi-criteria assessment of potential lead markets for electrified vehicles in Europe
    Zubaryeva, Alyona
    Thiel, Christian
    Zaccarelli, Nicola
    Barbone, Enrico
    Mercier, Arnaud
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (09) : 1477 - 1489
  • [34] Residents' perception of flood risk and urban stream restoration using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Hong, Chang-Yu
    Chang, Heejun
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 36 (10) : 2078 - 2088
  • [35] A Multi-Criteria Approach for the Evaluation of Low Risk Restoration Projects in Continuous Surface Lignite Mines
    Spanidis, Philip-Mark
    Roumpos, Christos
    Pavloudakis, Francis
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (09)
  • [36] Conflicting Values in Rural Planning: A Multifunctionality Approach through Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation
    Etxano, Iker
    Barinaga-Rementeria, Itziar
    Garcia, Oihana
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (05)
  • [37] Using GIS and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Conflict Resolution in Land Use Planning
    Zhang, Y. J.
    Li, A. J.
    Fung, T.
    18TH BIENNIAL ISEM CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL MODELLING FOR GLOBAL CHANGE AND COUPLED HUMAN AND NATURAL SYSTEM, 2012, 13 : 2264 - 2273
  • [38] Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups
    Sheppard, SRJ
    Meitner, M
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 207 (1-2) : 171 - 187
  • [39] Participatory Multi-Criteria Assessment of Forest Planning Policies in Conflicting Situations: The Case of Tenerife
    Acosta, Montserrat
    Corral, Serafin
    FORESTS, 2015, 6 (11) : 3946 - 3969
  • [40] Flat Roofs Renovation Planning on Public Buildings Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Analysis
    Rogulj, Katarina
    Jajac, Niksa
    Batinic, Katja
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)