Can organizational justice help the retention of general practitioners?

被引:15
作者
Heponiemi, Tarja [1 ]
Manderbacka, Kristiina [1 ]
Vanska, Jukka [2 ]
Elovainio, Marko [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf, Helsinki 00271, Finland
[2] Finnish Med Assoc, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Primary health care; General practitioners; Organizational justice; Job attitudes; LONG-TERM-CARE; JOB-SATISFACTION; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; PERCEPTIONS; FAIRNESS; MANAGEMENT; EMPLOYEES; TURNOVER; STRESS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.02.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In many countries, public sector has major difficulties in recruiting and retaining physicians to work as general practitioners (GPs). We examined the effects of taking up a public sector GP position and leaving public sector GP work on the changes of job satisfaction, job involvement and turnover intentions. In addition, we examined whether organizational justice in the new position would moderate these associations. This was a four-year prospective questionnaire study including two measurements among 1581 (948 women, 60%) Finnish physicians. A change to work as a public GP was associated with a substantial decrease in job satisfaction and job involvement when new GPs experienced that their primary care organization was unfair. However, high organizational justice was able to buffer against these negative effects. Those who changed to work as public GPs had 2.8 times and those who stayed as public GPs had 1.6 times higher likelihood of having turnover intentions compared to those who worked in other positions. Organizational justice was not able to buffer against this effect. Primary care organizations should pay more attention to their GPs - especially to newcomers - and to the fairness how management behaves towards employees, how processes are determined, and how rewards are distributed. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 28
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Appleton K, 1998, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V48, P1059
[2]  
BIES RobertJ., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations, P43, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.TB02581.X
[3]   A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement [J].
Brown, SP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (02) :235-255
[4]   Effects of training in procedural justice on perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts [J].
Cole, ND ;
Latham, GP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (05) :699-705
[5]   On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure [J].
Colquitt, JA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) :386-400
[6]  
Dowell AC, 2000, NEW ZEAL MED J, V113, P269
[7]   Organizational justice:: Evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health [J].
Elovainio, M ;
Kivimäki, M ;
Vahtera, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 92 (01) :105-108
[8]  
Elovainio M, 2007, SUOM LAAKARIL, V20-21, P2071
[9]   Developing a Short Measure of Organizational Justice: A Multisample Health Professionals Study [J].
Elovainio, Marko ;
Heponiemi, Tarja ;
Kuusio, Hannamaria ;
Sinervo, Timo ;
Hintsa, Taina ;
Aalto, Anna-Mari .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2010, 52 (11) :1068-1074
[10]  
FOLGER R, 1989, ACAD MANAGE J, V32, P115, DOI 10.5465/256422