Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience

被引:59
作者
Dunn, D. H. [1 ]
Johnson, E. M. [1 ]
Morphew, J. A. [1 ]
Dilworth, H. P.
Krueger, J. L.
Banerji, N.
机构
[1] Abbott NW Hosp, Virginia Piper Canc Inst, Allina Hosp & Clin, Esophageal & Gastr Canc Program, Minneapolis, MN 55407 USA
关键词
esophageal cancer; morbidity; robotic esophagectomy; transhiatal; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; CANCER; ANASTOMOSIS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; METAANALYSIS; ADVANTAGES; CARCINOMA; SURGERY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Minimally invasive esophagectomy has emerged as an important procedure for disease management in esophageal cancer (EC) with clear margin status, less morbidity, and shorter hospital stays compared with open procedures. The experience with transhiatal approach robotic esophagectomy (RE) for dissection of thoracic esophagus and associated morbidity is described here. Between March 2007 and November 2010, 40 patients with resectable esophageal indications underwent transhiatal RE at the institute. Clinical data for all patients were collected prospectively. Of 40 patients undergoing RE, one patient had an extensive benign stricture, one had high-grade dysplasia, and 38 had EC. Five patients were converted from robotic to open. Median operative time and estimated blood loss were 311 minutes and 97.2 mL, respectively. Median intensive care unit stay was 1 day (range, 016), and median length of hospital stay was 9 days (range, 636). Postoperative complications frequently observed were anastomotic stricture (n= 27), recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis (n= 14), anastomotic leak (n= 10), pneumonia (n= 8), and pleural effusion (n= 18). Incidence rates of laryngeal nerve paresis (35%) and leak rate (25%) were somewhat higher in comparison with that reported in literature. However, all vocal cord injuries were temporary, and all leaks healed following opening of the cervical incision and drainage. None of the patients died in the hospital, and 30-day mortality was 2.5% (1/40). Median number of lymph nodes removed was 20 (range, 338). In 33 patients with known lymph node locations, median of four (range, 012) nodes was obtained from the mediastinum, and median of 15 (range, 126) was obtained from the abdomen. R0 resection was achieved in 94.7% of patients. At the end of the follow-up period, 25 patients were alive, 13 were deceased, and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. For patients with EC, median disease-free survival was 20 months (range, 345). Transhiatal RE, by experience, is a feasible albeit evolving oncologic operation with low hospital mortality. The benefits include minimally invasive mediastinal dissection without thoracotomy or thoracoscopy. A reasonable operative time with minimal blood loss and postoperative morbidity can be achieved, in spite of the technically demanding nature of the procedure. Broader use of this technology in a setting of high-volume comprehensive surgical programs will almost certainly reduce the complication rates. Robotic tanshiatal esophagectomy with the elimination of a thoracic approach should be considered an option for the appropriate patient population in a comprehensive esophageal program.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 166
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Should en bloc esophagectomy be the standard of care for esophageal carcinoma? [J].
Altorki, N ;
Skinner, D .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (05) :581-587
[2]   Esophagogastrectomy: The influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcome [J].
Behzadi, A ;
Nichols, FC ;
Cassivi, SD ;
Deschamps, C ;
Allen, MS ;
Pairolero, PC .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2005, 9 (08) :1031-1040
[3]   Cervical or Thoracic Anastomosis after Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Biere, S. S. A. Y. ;
Maas, K. W. ;
Cuesta, M. A. ;
van der Peet, D. L. .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 28 (01) :29-35
[4]   Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival [J].
Braghetto, I. ;
Csendes, A. ;
Cardemil, G. ;
Burdiles, P. ;
Korn, O. ;
Valladares, H. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (11) :1681-1686
[5]   Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery - Preliminary experience [J].
Corcione, F ;
Esposito, C ;
Cuccurullo, D ;
Settembre, A ;
Miranda, N ;
Amato, F ;
Pirozzi, F ;
Caiazzo, P .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (01) :117-119
[6]  
DEPAULA AL, 1995, SURG LAPAROSC ENDOSC, V5, P1
[7]  
Edge S.B., 2010, AJCC cancer staging manual, V649
[8]   Robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy [J].
Galvani, C. A. ;
Gorodner, M. V. ;
Moser, F. ;
Jacobsen, G. ;
Chretien, C. ;
Espat, N. J. ;
Donahue, P. ;
Horgan, S. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (01) :188-195
[9]   Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: controversies part 1 [J].
Goldfarb, Melanie ;
Brower, Steven ;
Schwaitzberg, S. D. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (02) :304-334
[10]  
Horgan S, 2003, AM SURGEON, V69, P624