The business perspective on materials criticality: Evidence from manufacturers

被引:28
作者
Lapko, Yulia [1 ,2 ]
Trucco, Paolo [1 ]
Nuur, Cali [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Ind Econ & Management, Lindstedtsvagen 30, SE-11428 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Critical materials; Manufacturers; Criticality factors; Mitigation strategies; SUPPLY CHAIN RISK; NATURAL-RESOURCE SCARCITY; MANAGEMENT; MINERALS; DESIGN; METALS; MODEL; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.09.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Commission identified a group of materials that were claimed to be critical due to their high economic importance and high supply constraints, which could become bottlenecks for the deployment of emerging technologies and enabling sustainable production. Currently this discourse takes place at the industrial system level from a policy perspective, and it is unclear if what is perceived by policy circles as critical could be true for manufacturing operations. This paper explores how five EU manufacturing companies in different sectors and supply chains see materials criticality, and their strategies to mitigate such criticality. On the one hand, the results indicate the limited scope of the criticality factors and employed mitigation strategies considered, compared to those established in the literature. On the other hand, the findings point to the existence of interdependences between companies within and between supply chains, which should be incorporated into the materials criticality assessment, if viable implications for the industrial systems are to be developed. The paper concludes by discussing the implications for manufacturing companies and policy-makers, and suggests prospects for further research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 107
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Looking for a Fit for Purpose: Business Process Maturity Models from a User's Perspective [J].
Van Looy, Amy .
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS OF THE FUTURE, 2013, 139 :182-189
[32]   QUALITY OF THE TEACHING PROCESS AND ITS FACTORS OF INFLUENCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF FUTURE BUSINESS SPECIALISTS [J].
Drule, Alexandra-Maria ;
Popa, Irimie Emil ;
Nistor, Razvan ;
Chis, Alexandru .
AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2014, 16 (37) :827-840
[33]   Business Srategy and Overvaluation: Evidence from Korea [J].
Cha, Sangkwon ;
Hwang, Sunpil ;
Kim, Yibae .
JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2019, 6 (04) :83-90
[34]   Critical raw materials: A perspective from the materials science community [J].
Hofmann, Margarethe ;
Hofmann, Heinrich ;
Hageluken, Christian ;
Hool, Alessandra .
SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 17
[35]   ETHICS AND BUSINESS Evidence from Sikh Religion [J].
Singh, Charan .
JOURNAL OF DHARMA, 2013, 38 (04) :343-356
[36]   A Maturity Model for Digital Business Ecosystems from an IT Perspective [J].
Ehrensperger, Robert ;
Sauerwein, Clemens ;
Breu, Ruth .
JOURNAL OF UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2023, 29 (01) :34-72
[37]   Business Models for Sustainability From a System Dynamics Perspective [J].
Abdelkafi, Nizar ;
Taeuscher, Karl .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 29 (01) :74-96
[38]   Green Crowdshipping: Critical factors from a business perspective [J].
Nascimento, Carla de Oliveira Leite ;
Gatta, Valerio ;
Marcucci, Edoardo .
RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 51
[39]   A componovation perspective of innovation in emerging markets: Evidence from Indian organizations [J].
Dutta, Swarup K. ;
Snehvrat, Saurav .
THUNDERBIRD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2020, 62 (01) :65-75
[40]   Criticality assessment for raw materials: perspectives and focuses [J].
Schicho, Michaela ;
Espinoza, Luis Tercero .
MINERAL ECONOMICS, 2024,