Evaluation of Diagnostic Scores for Acute Appendicitis

被引:0
作者
Wu Xingye [1 ]
Li Yuqiang [1 ]
Wang Rong [1 ]
Zhang Hongyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源
JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN | 2018年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词
Acute appendicitis; Diagnosis; Alvarado score; Sensitivity; NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY RATE; MODIFIED ALVARADO SCORE; SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SYSTEM; VALIDATION; ACCURACY; ADULTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the sensitivity of the Alvarado score (AS), modified Alvarado score (MAS), Fenyo-Lindberg score (FS), Lintula score (LS), Eskelinen score (ES), Teicher score (TS), and Christian score (CS) [seven scorings] in patients with acute appendicitis (AA). Study Design: Analytical study. Place and Duration of Study: The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China, from January 2012 to June 2015. Methodology: Patients with diagnosis of AA were evaluated retrospectively to compare the scoring systems. The diagnostic sensitivity (the correct number of diagnoses divided by the total number) was compared. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: One hundred and seventy-nine patients were studied. The sensitivity of AS was 92.7%; It outperformed each of the other scores. The sensitivity of FS, LS, and TS in women was lower than that in men (p=0.016, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). The sensitivity of the FS, ES, TS, and CS in patients with a duration of illness greater than 48 hours was lower than that in patients with a duration of illness less than 48 hours (p<0.001 for all). Conclusion: AS is the most useful and sensitive diagnostic tool for AA. FS, LS, and TS had a lower diagnostic sensitivity in women; and FS, ES, TS, and CS had a low sensitivity in patients with a duration of illness greater than 48 hours.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 114
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   A PRACTICAL SCORE FOR THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS [J].
ALVARADO, A .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (05) :557-564
[2]   The appendicitis inflammatory response score: A tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score [J].
Andersson, Manne ;
Andersson, Roland E. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 32 (08) :1843-1849
[3]  
ANDERSSON RE, 1992, EUR J SURG, V158, P37
[4]   Does this child have appendicitis? [J].
Bundy, David G. ;
Byerley, Julie S. ;
Liles, E. Allen ;
Perrin, Eliana M. ;
Katznelson, Jessica ;
Rice, Henry E. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 298 (04) :438-451
[5]  
CHRISTIAN F, 1992, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V74, P281
[6]   Negative Appendectomy and Imaging Accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program [J].
Cuschieri, Joseph ;
Florence, Michael ;
Flum, David R. ;
Jurkovich, Gregory J. ;
Lin, Paul ;
Steele, Scott R. ;
Symons, Rebecca Gaston ;
Thirlby, Richard .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (04) :557-562
[7]   The Fenyo-Lindberg scoring system for appendicitis increases positive predictive value in fertile women -: A prospective study in 455 patients randomized to either laparoscopic or open appendectomy [J].
Enochsson, L ;
Gudbjartsson, T ;
Hellberg, A ;
Rudberg, C ;
Wenner, J ;
Ringqvist, I ;
Sörensen, S ;
Fenyö, G .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (10) :1509-1513
[8]  
GILMORE OJA, 1975, LANCET, V2, P421
[9]   The diagnosis of acute appendicitis: Clinical assessment versus computed tomography evaluation [J].
Gwynn, LK .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 21 (02) :119-123
[10]   Appendectomy - A contemporary appraisal [J].
Hale, DA ;
Molloy, M ;
Pearl, RH ;
Schutt, DC ;
Jaques, DP .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 225 (03) :252-261