Change in calculated cardiovascular risk due to guideline revision: A cross-sectional study in the Netherlands

被引:3
|
作者
Luymes, Clare H. [1 ]
de Ruijter, Wouter [1 ]
Poortvliet, Rosalinde K. E. [1 ]
Putter, Hein [2 ]
van Duijn, Huug J. [3 ]
Numans, Mattijs E. [1 ]
Drewes, Yvonne M. [1 ]
Blom, Jeanet W. [1 ]
Assendelft, Willem J. J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat & Bioinformat, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Hlth Cooperat Katwijk Langs de Rijn, Katwijk, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Primary & Community care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Cardiovascular diseases; risk assessment; guidelines as topic; preventive medicine; primary prevention; AMERICAN-HEART-ASSOCIATION; SECONDARY PREVENTION; LIPID MODIFICATION; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; DISEASE; HYPERTENSION; CARDIOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.3109/13814788.2015.1064389
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Guidelines and accompanying risk charts concerning cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) are regularly revised worldwide.Objective: To evaluate whether revision of the Dutch CVRM guideline has led to the reclassification of patients and, accordingly, to changes in drug recommendations.Methods: All medical records (year 2011) of patients aged 40-65 years with no history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) but using antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering drugs, were selected from the Registration Network of General Practices associated with Leiden University Medical Center. Multiple imputation techniques for missing determinants were used. The individual cardiovascular risk was calculated and the resulting drug recommendation was assessed according to both the 2006 and 2012 versions of the guideline.Results: In total, 2075 patients were selected, of whom 1248 fulfilled the guideline criteria (systolic blood pressure 115-180 mmHg and total cholesterol/high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio 3.5-8). According to the 2012 guideline, 58.2% of the patients had low risk and 249 patients (20.0%) shifted to a different risk category. For 150 of these patients (12.0%), this category shift implied a shift in drug recommendation. The probability of shifting in drug recommendation increased with increasing age, cholesterol level, and blood pressure, and by being male.Conclusion: Guideline revision may have important implications: based on identical values for risk factors, according to the latest revision of the Dutch CVRM guideline 20% of patients shifted in risk category and 12% of the patients shifted in drug recommendation.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 223
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comparison of Actual Cardiovascular Disease Risks to the Perceptions of Middle-aged Men: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Topuz, Ibrahim
    Gozum, Sebahat
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (03): : 607 - 617
  • [22] Cardiovascular risk factors and major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional study in Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Bivanco-Lima, Danielle
    Santos, Itamar de Souza
    Wang, Yuan-Pang
    Viana, Maria Carmen
    Andrade, Laura Helena
    Lotufo, Paulo Andrade
    Bensenor, Isabela Judith Martins
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 139 (04): : 364 - 371
  • [23] Opportunistic screening of cardiovascular disease risk factors in community pharmacies in Nigeria: a cross-sectional study
    Amadi, Casmir
    Lawal, Folasade
    Ajiboye, Wale
    Agbim, Rosarii
    Mbakwem, Amam
    Ajuluchukwu, Jayne
    Oke, David A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2020, 42 (06) : 1469 - 1479
  • [24] Correlation of serum magnesium with cardiovascular risk factors in maintenance hemodialysis patients - a cross-sectional study
    Liu, Feng
    Zhang, Xintian
    Qi, Hualin
    Wang, Jun
    Wang, Min
    Zhang, Yingying
    Yan, Haidong
    Zhuang, Shougang
    MAGNESIUM RESEARCH, 2013, 26 (03) : 100 - 108
  • [25] Relationship Between Hyperuricemia and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in a Chinese Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Su, Pu
    Hong, Liu
    Zhao, Yifan
    Sun, Hang
    Li, Liang
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2015, 21
  • [26] Factors Associated With Nonadherence to Cardiovascular Medications A Cross-sectional Study
    van der Laan, Danielle M.
    Elders, Petra J. M.
    Boons, Christel C. L. M.
    Nijpels, Giel
    Hugtenburg, Jacqueline G.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2019, 34 (04) : 344 - 352
  • [27] Predictors of the quality of cardiovascular prevention - a multilevel cross-sectional study
    Petek, Davorina
    Ferligoj, Anuska
    Platinovsek, Rok
    Kersnik, Janko
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 52 (06) : 718 - 727
  • [28] High prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in Peruvian adolescents living in a peri-urban shantytown: a cross-sectional study
    Abbs, Elizabeth S.
    Vinoles, Jose
    Alarcon, Jorge O.
    Johnson, Heather M.
    Zunt, Joseph R.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POPULATION AND NUTRITION, 2017, 36 : 19
  • [29] Cardiovagal Modulation, Oxidative Stress, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Prehypertensive Subjects: Cross-Sectional Study
    Thiyagarajan, Ramkumar
    Pal, Pravati
    Pal, Gopal Krushna
    Subramanian, Senthil Kumar
    Bobby, Zachariah
    Das, Ashok Kumar
    Trakroo, Madanmohan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2013, 26 (07) : 850 - 857
  • [30] Do family physicians advise younger people on cardiovascular disease prevention? A cross-sectional study from Slovenia
    Petek, Davorina
    Platinovsek, Rok
    Klemenc-Ketis, Zalika
    Kersnik, Janko
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2013, 14