Change in calculated cardiovascular risk due to guideline revision: A cross-sectional study in the Netherlands

被引:3
|
作者
Luymes, Clare H. [1 ]
de Ruijter, Wouter [1 ]
Poortvliet, Rosalinde K. E. [1 ]
Putter, Hein [2 ]
van Duijn, Huug J. [3 ]
Numans, Mattijs E. [1 ]
Drewes, Yvonne M. [1 ]
Blom, Jeanet W. [1 ]
Assendelft, Willem J. J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat & Bioinformat, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Hlth Cooperat Katwijk Langs de Rijn, Katwijk, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Primary & Community care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Cardiovascular diseases; risk assessment; guidelines as topic; preventive medicine; primary prevention; AMERICAN-HEART-ASSOCIATION; SECONDARY PREVENTION; LIPID MODIFICATION; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; DISEASE; HYPERTENSION; CARDIOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.3109/13814788.2015.1064389
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Guidelines and accompanying risk charts concerning cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) are regularly revised worldwide.Objective: To evaluate whether revision of the Dutch CVRM guideline has led to the reclassification of patients and, accordingly, to changes in drug recommendations.Methods: All medical records (year 2011) of patients aged 40-65 years with no history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) but using antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering drugs, were selected from the Registration Network of General Practices associated with Leiden University Medical Center. Multiple imputation techniques for missing determinants were used. The individual cardiovascular risk was calculated and the resulting drug recommendation was assessed according to both the 2006 and 2012 versions of the guideline.Results: In total, 2075 patients were selected, of whom 1248 fulfilled the guideline criteria (systolic blood pressure 115-180 mmHg and total cholesterol/high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio 3.5-8). According to the 2012 guideline, 58.2% of the patients had low risk and 249 patients (20.0%) shifted to a different risk category. For 150 of these patients (12.0%), this category shift implied a shift in drug recommendation. The probability of shifting in drug recommendation increased with increasing age, cholesterol level, and blood pressure, and by being male.Conclusion: Guideline revision may have important implications: based on identical values for risk factors, according to the latest revision of the Dutch CVRM guideline 20% of patients shifted in risk category and 12% of the patients shifted in drug recommendation.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 223
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Small but important errors in cardiovascular risk calculation by practice nurses: A cross-sectional study in randomised trial setting
    Koelewijn-van Loon, Marije S.
    Eurlings, Jeroen W. G.
    Winkens, Bjorn
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Grol, Richard
    van Steenkiste, Ben
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2011, 48 (03) : 285 - 291
  • [2] Cardiovascular disease patients have increased risk for comorbidity: A cross-sectional study in the Netherlands
    Kendir, Candan
    van den Akker, Marjan
    Vos, Rein
    Metsemakers, Job
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2017, 24 (01) : 45 - 50
  • [3] The Impact of the 2019 European Guideline for Cardiovascular Risk Management: A Cross-Sectional Study in General Practice
    Meier, Rahel
    Rachamin, Yael
    Rosemann, Thomas
    Markun, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (07) : 1 - 12
  • [4] Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of and risk factors for hoof disorders in horses in The Netherlands
    Holzhauer, M.
    Bremer, R.
    Santman-Berends, I.
    Smink, O.
    Janssens, I.
    Back, W.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2017, 140 : 53 - 59
  • [5] Diagnostic inertia in obesity and the impact on cardiovascular risk in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Martinez-St John, Damian R. J.
    Palazon-Bru, Antonio
    Gil-Guillen, Vicente F.
    Sepehri, Armina
    Navarro-Cremades, Felipe
    Ramirez-Prado, Dolores
    Orozco-Beltran, Domingo
    Carratala-Munuera, Concepcion
    Cortes, Ernesto
    Rizo-Baeza, Maria M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2015, 65 (636) : e454 - e459
  • [6] Cardiovascular risk profile of high school students: A cross-sectional study
    Rocha, Teresa
    Rocha, Evangelista
    Alves, Ana Catarina
    Medeiros, Ana Margarida
    Francisco, Vania
    Silva, Sonia
    Gaspar, Isabel Mendes
    Rato, Quiteria
    Bourbon, Mafalda
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2014, 33 (09) : 525 - 534
  • [7] Assessment of cardiovascular disease risk in Northern China: a cross-sectional study
    Zhu, Hao
    Xi, Yunfeng
    Bao, Han
    Xu, Xiaoqian
    Niu, Liwei
    Tao, Yan
    Cao, Ning
    Wang, Wenrui
    Zhang, Xingguang
    ANNALS OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2020, 47 (05) : 498 - 503
  • [8] Missed opportunities in prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Sheppard, James P.
    Fletcher, Kate
    McManus, Richard J.
    Mant, Jonathan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (618) : E38 - E46
  • [9] Increased modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a multicenter cross-sectional study
    dos Santos, Alexandre Moura
    Misse, Rafael Giovani
    Borges, Isabela Bruna Pires
    Gualano, Bruno
    de Souza, Alexandre Wagner Silva
    Takayama, Liliam
    Pereira, Rosa Maria R.
    Shinjo, Samuel Katsuyuki
    ADVANCES IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 61 (01)
  • [10] Cardiovascular risk and systemic inflammation in male professional rugby: a cross-sectional study
    Mchugh, Cliodhna
    Hind, Karen
    Kelly, Aine
    Fearon, Ursula
    Wasfy, Meagan
    Floudas, Achilleas
    Barad, Zsuzsanna
    Dane, Kathryn
    Farrell, Gareth
    Wilson, Fiona
    BMJ OPEN SPORT & EXERCISE MEDICINE, 2023, 9 (04)