Compressive behavior of double skin composite wall with different plate thicknesses

被引:78
作者
Qin, Ying [1 ,3 ]
Shu, Gan-Ping [1 ]
Zhou, Guan-Gen [2 ]
Han, Jian-Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Key Lab Concrete & Prestressed Concrete Struct, Minist Educ, Natl Prestress Engn Res Ctr,Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Southeast Space Frame Grp Co Ltd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] 2 Southeast Univ Rd, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Compressive behavior; Composite wall; Double skin; Plate thickness; STEEL-PLATE; SEISMIC BEHAVIOR; STRENGTH; SHEAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.02.023
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Double skin steel-concrete composite walls could offer high capacity and stiffness while affiliating the construction. The structural behavior of double skin steel-concrete composite walls under axial compression is largely dependent on the interface bonding between the steel plate and the concrete core. Weak restraint between these two different materials may lead to early local buckling of the steel plate and thus the separation between the steel and concrete surfaces under large compression. Furthermore, the plate thickness is essential to the axial behavior of composite walls. Thin plate may cause early local buckling and thus reduce the axial load capacity. This paper investigates a new type of double skin composite wall. The steel truss constructed by two angles and kinked rebar is acting as the interface connector. Full-scaled tests were conducted on three specimens with different plate thicknesses. The structural behavior of the walls was comprehensively evaluated in terms of load-displacement curve, buckling stress, axial stiffness, ductility ratio, strength index, load-lateral deflection response, and strain distribution. The influences of plate thickness on the structural performance were discussed in details. The test data was compared with the calculated results based on three modern codes. It was found that Eurocode 4 provides the most conservative results while CECS: 2018 offers the most suitable predictions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 313
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Akiyama H., 1991, Transactions of the 11th Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT- 11), Tokyo, Japan, Paper ID H12/2, IASMiRT, P323
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 199311 EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, AISC 360 16
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 29752018 GBT
[5]  
CECS, 2018, TECHN STAND STRUCT C
[6]  
Choi BJ, 2009, STEEL COMPOS STRUCT, V9, P519
[7]   Experimental behavior and design method of rectangular concrete-filled tubular columns using Q460 high-strength steel [J].
Du, Yansheng ;
Chen, Zhihua ;
Xiong, Ming-Xiang .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2016, 125 :856-872
[8]   Behavior of Double Skin Composite Wall Subjected to In-Plane Cyclic Loading [J].
Eom, Tae-Sung ;
Park, Hong-Gun ;
Lee, Cheol-Ho ;
Kim, Jin-Ho ;
Chang, In-Hwa .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (10) :1239-1249
[9]  
Eurocode 4, 2004, BS EN 1994-1- 1
[10]  
GB, 2015, GB50010-2010