Percutaneous Posterior Instrumentation Followed by Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Infectious Spondylitis

被引:14
|
作者
Ha, Kee-Yong [1 ]
Kim, Young-Hoon [1 ]
Seo, Jun-Yeong [2 ]
Bae, Seung-Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul 137701, South Korea
[2] Jeju Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Cheju, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2013年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
spondylitis; anterior interbody fusion; minimally invasive; percutaneous pedicle instrumentation; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; PYOGENIC SPONDYLODISCITIS; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; GRAFT; CAGES; DISTRACTION; SUBSIDENCE; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; STRUT;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eaf56
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: To investigate the clinical feasibility and outcomes from direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) using autogenous bone grafts and percutaneous posterior instrumentation (PPI) for infectious spondylitis. Summary of Background Data: As one of the minimally invasive techniques, PPI has been attempted for various degenerative lumbar spine disorders combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. PPI has been played more roles recently as an internal fixation method for infectious spondylitis. However, the clinical outcomes of DLIF using an autogenous bone graft combined with PPI for infectious spondylitis have been rarely reported. Materials and Methods: Sixteen patients (mean age, 60.3 +/- 18.8 y) who suffered from pyogenic spondylitis underwent single-stage DLIF using an autogenous iliac bone graft combined with PPI. Clinical and radiologic outcomes were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and eradication of primary disease. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by changes of affected segmental lordosis and fusion status. Results: Bony fusion and eradication of primary disease were obtained in all patient except 1 case during the follow-up (mean, 31.3 +/- 13.1 mo; range 14-46 mo). Preoperative VAS (7 +/- 1.2) and ODI (61.3 +/- 5.4) scores improved significantly at the last follow-up (VAS, 3.4 +/- 1.5; ODI, 32.3 +/- 15.4). C-reactive protein normalized at postoperative 20.1 +/- 0.7 days (range, 15-28 d). Although height and lordosis in the affected segment were restored by surgery, all patients showed loss of the restored lordosis and height at the final follow-up. Loss of the restored lordosis and height were related to subsidence of the grafted bone. Conclusions: Minimally invasive PPI followed by debridement and DLIF was a feasible surgical alternative in our consecutive 16 cases of pyogenic spondylitis. In most cases, however the subsidence of anteriorly grafted fusion was inevitable despite successful fusion and eradication of the primary lesion.
引用
收藏
页码:E95 / E100
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion with direct psoas visualization
    Yuan, Philip S.
    Rowshan, Kasra
    Verma, Rohit B.
    Miller, Larry E.
    Block, Jon E.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2014, 9
  • [32] Reasons for revision following stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Nguyen, Austin Q.
    Harvey, Jackson P.
    Khanna, Krishn
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Harada, Garrett K.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Singh, Kern
    Dewald, Christopher
    An, Howard S.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [33] Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion with direct psoas visualization
    Philip S Yuan
    Kasra Rowshan
    Rohit B Verma
    Larry E Miller
    Jon E Block
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 9
  • [34] Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Anteriorly Placed Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Instrumentation
    Lee, Yunsoo
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    McCurdy, Michael A.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Fras, Sebastian I.
    Purtill, William
    Millar, Ben
    Kolowrat, Samantha
    Issa, Tariq Z.
    D'Antonio, Nicholas D.
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Kaye, Ian David
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (15) : 1078 - 1084
  • [35] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and segmental lumbar lordosis
    Kakkar, Rahul
    Sirigiri, P. B. R.
    Howieson, A.
    Raman, A. Siva
    Crawford, R. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2007, 17 (02) : 125 - 129
  • [36] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5
    Jang, Hae-Dong
    Lee, Jae Chul
    Seo, Jong-Hyeon
    Roh, Young-Ho
    Choi, Sung-Woo
    Shin, Byung-Joon
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 158 : E10 - E18
  • [37] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Stadler, James A., III
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 25 (02) : 377 - +
  • [38] Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: a 10-year experience
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Faramand, Andrew
    Alan, Nima
    Tempel, Zachary J.
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Kanter, Adam S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 29 (05) : 525 - 529
  • [39] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Outcomes, and Complications
    Kwon, Brian
    Kim, David Hanwuk
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2016, 24 (02) : 96 - 105
  • [40] Predictors of subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Ohiorhenuan, Ifije E.
    Walker, Corey T.
    Zhou, James J.
    Godzik, Jakub
    Sagar, Soumya
    Farber, S. Harrison
    Uribe, Juan S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 37 (02) : 183 - 187