Percutaneous Posterior Instrumentation Followed by Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Infectious Spondylitis

被引:14
|
作者
Ha, Kee-Yong [1 ]
Kim, Young-Hoon [1 ]
Seo, Jun-Yeong [2 ]
Bae, Seung-Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul 137701, South Korea
[2] Jeju Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Cheju, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2013年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
spondylitis; anterior interbody fusion; minimally invasive; percutaneous pedicle instrumentation; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; PYOGENIC SPONDYLODISCITIS; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; GRAFT; CAGES; DISTRACTION; SUBSIDENCE; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; STRUT;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eaf56
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: To investigate the clinical feasibility and outcomes from direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) using autogenous bone grafts and percutaneous posterior instrumentation (PPI) for infectious spondylitis. Summary of Background Data: As one of the minimally invasive techniques, PPI has been attempted for various degenerative lumbar spine disorders combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. PPI has been played more roles recently as an internal fixation method for infectious spondylitis. However, the clinical outcomes of DLIF using an autogenous bone graft combined with PPI for infectious spondylitis have been rarely reported. Materials and Methods: Sixteen patients (mean age, 60.3 +/- 18.8 y) who suffered from pyogenic spondylitis underwent single-stage DLIF using an autogenous iliac bone graft combined with PPI. Clinical and radiologic outcomes were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and eradication of primary disease. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by changes of affected segmental lordosis and fusion status. Results: Bony fusion and eradication of primary disease were obtained in all patient except 1 case during the follow-up (mean, 31.3 +/- 13.1 mo; range 14-46 mo). Preoperative VAS (7 +/- 1.2) and ODI (61.3 +/- 5.4) scores improved significantly at the last follow-up (VAS, 3.4 +/- 1.5; ODI, 32.3 +/- 15.4). C-reactive protein normalized at postoperative 20.1 +/- 0.7 days (range, 15-28 d). Although height and lordosis in the affected segment were restored by surgery, all patients showed loss of the restored lordosis and height at the final follow-up. Loss of the restored lordosis and height were related to subsidence of the grafted bone. Conclusions: Minimally invasive PPI followed by debridement and DLIF was a feasible surgical alternative in our consecutive 16 cases of pyogenic spondylitis. In most cases, however the subsidence of anteriorly grafted fusion was inevitable despite successful fusion and eradication of the primary lesion.
引用
收藏
页码:E95 / E100
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simultaneous Lateral Interbody Fusion and Posterior Percutaneous Instrumentation: Early Experience and Technical Considerations
    Drazin, Doniel
    Kim, Terrence T.
    Johnson, J. Patrick
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [2] Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology A Comparative Study With Conventional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Park, Hyung-Youl
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Ha, Kee-Yong
    Kim, Sang-Il
    Min, Hyung-Ki
    Oh, In-Soo
    Seo, Jun-Yeong
    Chang, Dong-Gune
    Park, Jong-Tae
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (10): : 2019 - E433
  • [3] Extreme lateral interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation for spondylodiscitis
    Blizzard, Daniel J.
    Hills, Christopher P.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    Brown, Christopher R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (11) : 1758 - 1761
  • [4] Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Supplemental Posterior Instrumentation in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Zhou, XiaoCheng
    Zhou, Qiujun
    Jin, Xiaoliang
    Zhang, Jinjie
    Song, Zhoufeng
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (02) : 1375 - 1389
  • [5] Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Khoo, LT
    Palmer, S
    Laich, DT
    Fessler, RG
    NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (05) : S166 - S181
  • [6] Clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion and modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease
    Liu, Zhengping
    Wang, Siyu
    Li, Tao
    Chen, Si
    Li, Ying
    Xie, Wei
    Tang, Jin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [7] Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculous Spondylodiscitis by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Posterior Instrumentation
    Zaveri, Gautam R.
    Mehta, Satyen S.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2009, 22 (04): : 257 - 262
  • [8] A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF)
    Rathbone, John
    Rackham, Matthew
    Nielsen, David
    Lee, So Mang
    Hing, Wayne
    Riar, Sukhman
    Scott-Young, Matthew
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (06) : 1911 - 1926
  • [9] Comparison of Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Posterior Fixation in Lateral Position and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Koike, Yoshinao
    Kotani, Yoshihisa
    Terao, Hidemasa
    Iwasaki, Norimasa
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (01) : 97 - 106
  • [10] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants
    Rickert, M.
    Arabmotlagh, M.
    Carstens, C.
    Behrbalk, E.
    Rauschmann, M.
    Fleege, C.
    ORTHOPADE, 2015, 44 (02): : 162 - 169