Systematic review of the impact of N-acetylcysteine on contrast nephropathy

被引:182
|
作者
Pannu, N
Manns, B
Lee, H
Tonelli, M
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Div Nephrol, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Div Crit Care Med, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Ctr Hlth & Policy Studies, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Inst Hlth Econ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
acute renal failure; meta-analysis; contrast media; acetylcysteine;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00516.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. The efficacy of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for preventing contrast nephropathy is uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of NAC for preventing contrast nephropathy after administration of intravenous contrast media. Methods. Data were obtained from searching MEDLINE (1969-2003) and EMBASE (1988-2003), Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trial Registry (2002, Volume 3), and conference proceedings. We considered all randomized studies that compared changes in renal function between groups that received and did not receive NAC. Studies in which the control group also received active therapy were excluded, although cointervention directed at both groups was permitted. Two reviewers independently extracted quantitative and qualitative data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus with the aid of a third party. Results. Fifteen studies with a total of 1776 patients satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria. Contrast nephropathy was typically defined by an increase in serum creatinine of 0.5 mg/dL within 24 to 48 hours of contrast administration. The pooled random effect relative risk was 0.65 (0.43-1.00, P = 0.049), indicating that NAC significantly reduced the incidence of contrast nephropathy. However, the effect of NAC was not statistically significant in several prespecified subgroup analyses, and the results were not robust to the addition of hypothetical new or unidentified randomized trials. There was evidence of significant heterogeneity in NAC effect across studies (Q = 26.3, P = 0.02). Random effects meta-regression did not implicate identified differences in participant or study characteristics as responsible for the observed heterogeneity. Conclusion. NAC may reduce the incidence of acutely increased serum creatinine after administration of intravenous contrast, but this finding was of borderline statistical significance, and there was significant heterogeneity between trials. Before NAC becomes the standard of care for all patients receiving intravenous contrast, new randomized trials evaluating its effect on clinically relevant outcomes are required.
引用
收藏
页码:1366 / 1374
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] N-acetylcysteine for contrast nephropathy:: More clinical science is required -: In reply
    Bagshaw, Sean M.
    McAlister, Finlay A.
    Manns, Braden J.
    Ghali, William A.
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (15) : 1669 - 1669
  • [32] Gender as a risk factor for contrast nephropathy: Effects of hydration and N-acetylcysteine
    Gill, NK
    Piccione, EA
    Vido, DA
    Clark, BA
    Shannon, RP
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 27 (10) : 554 - 558
  • [33] Response to the Letter to the Editor "N-Acetylcysteine and Contrast-Induced Nephropathy"
    Sun, Xi-peng
    Li, Jing
    Zhu, Wei-wei
    Li, Dong-bao
    Chen, Hui
    Li, Hong-wei
    Chen, Wen-ming
    Hua, Qi
    ANGIOLOGY, 2018, 69 (01) : 86 - 86
  • [34] Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine and aminophylline in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy
    Kinbara, Terufumi
    Hayano, Tomoko
    Ohtani, Nozomu
    Furutani, Yuhji
    Moritani, Kohshiro
    Matsuzaki, Masunori
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (02) : 174 - 179
  • [35] Effectiveness of N-Acetylcysteine for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xu, Renfan
    Tao, Anyu
    Bai, Yang
    Deng, Youbin
    Chen, Guangzhi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2016, 5 (09):
  • [36] Systematic review of the impact of N-acetyleysteine on contrast nephropathy
    Pannu, N
    Manns, B
    Lee, H
    Tonelli, M
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 : 282A - 282A
  • [37] Oral N-Acetylcysteine in Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy Following Coronary Angiogram
    Mohamed, Wan Mohd Izani Wan
    Darus, Zainal
    Yusof, Zurkurnai
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 15 (05): : 353 - 361
  • [38] Comparison of N-acetylcysteine and fenoldopam for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CAFCIN)
    Ng, Tien M. H.
    Shurmur, Scott W.
    Silver, Mary
    Nissen, Lindsay R.
    O'Leary, Edward L.
    Rigmaiden, Richard S.
    Cieciorka, Mike
    Porter, Laura L.
    Ineck, Beata A.
    Kline, Mary E.
    Puumala, Susan E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 109 (03) : 322 - 328
  • [39] Oral N-acetylcysteine in prevention of contrast induced nephropathy following coronary angiography
    Mohamed, Wan Mohd Izani Bin Wan
    NEPHROLOGY, 2008, 13 : A1 - A2
  • [40] Intravenous N-acetylcysteine for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy:: A randomised trial
    Carbonell, Nieves
    Blasco, Marisa
    Sanjuan, Rafael
    Perez-Sancho, Esther
    Sanchis, Juan
    Insa, Luis
    Bodi, Vicente
    Nunez, Julio
    Garcia-Ramon, Rafael
    Miguel, Alfonso
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 115 (01) : 57 - 62