Iodinated Contrast Agents Reduce the Efficacy of Intravenous Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: a Multicenter Cohort Study

This study aimed to investigate whether the application of iodinated contrast agents before intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) reduces the efficacy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. To determine whether the application of iodinated contrast agents before intravenous rt-PA reduces the efficacy in AIS patients. We analyzed our prospectively collected data of consecutive AIS patients receiving IV rt-PA treatment in the MISSION CHINA study. Clinical outcome at 3 months was assessed with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and dichotomized into good outcome (0-2) and poor outcome (3-6). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) was defined as cerebral hemorrhagic transformation in combination with clinical deterioration of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >= 4 points at 24-h. We performed logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching analysis to investigate the impact of iodinated contrast agents before IV rt-PA on poor outcome and sICH, respectively. A total of 3593 patients were finally included, and iodinated contrast agents were used before IV rt-PA among 859 (23.9%) patients. Patients in the iodinated contrast group were more likely to result in poor outcome (39.9% vs 33.4%,P = 0.001) and sICH (3.4% vs 1.5%,P < 0.001), compared with non-contrast group. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the application of iodinated contrast agents was independently associated with poor outcome (OR 1.342; 95% CI 1.103-1.631;P = 0.003) and sICH (OR 1.929; 95% CI 1.153-3.230;P = 0.012), respectively. After propensity score matching, the application of iodinated contrast agents was still independently associated with poor outcome (OR 1.246; 95% CI 1.016-1.531;P = 0.034) and sICH (OR 1.965; 95% CI 1.118-3.456;P = 0.019). Applying iodinated contrast agents before IV rt-PA may reduce the thrombolytic efficacy in AIS patients. Further benefit-risk analysis might be needed when iodinated contrast-used imaging is considered before intravenous thrombolysis.