Inter-Physician Variation in Follow-Up Colonoscopies after Screening Colonoscopy

被引:13
作者
Stock, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmeister, Michael [1 ]
Birkner, Berndt [3 ]
Brenner, Hermann [1 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Clin Epidemiol & Aging Res, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry & Informat, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Bavarian Assoc Statutory Hlth Insurance Phys, Munich, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 07期
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; SURVEILLANCE; GUIDELINES; POLYPECTOMY; ADENOMAS; UPDATE; RISK; US;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0069312
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Surveillance is an integral part of the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening process. We aimed to investigate inter-physician variation in follow-up procedures after screening colonoscopy in an opportunistic CRC screening program. Methods: A historical cohort study in the German statutory health insurance system was conducted. 55,301 individuals who underwent screening colonoscopy in 2006 in Bavaria, Germany, and who were not diagnosed with CRC were included. Utilization of follow-up colonoscopies performed by the same physician (328 physicians overall) within 3 years was ascertained. Mixed effects logistic regression modelling was used to assess the effect of physicians and other potential predictors (screening result, age group, and sex) on re-utilization of colonoscopy. Physicians were grouped into quintiles according to individual effects estimated in a preliminary model. Predicted probabilities of follow-up colonoscopy by screening result and physician group were calculated. Results: The observed rate of follow-up colonoscopy was 6.2% (95% confidence interval: 5.9-6.4%), 18.6% (17.8-19.4%), and 37.0% (35.5-38.4%) after negative colonoscopy, low-risk adenoma and high-risk adenoma detection, respectively. All considered predictors were statistically significantly associated with follow-up colonoscopy. The predicted probabilities of follow-up colonoscopy ranged from 1.7% (1.4-2.0%) to 11.0% (10.2-11.7%), from 7.3% (6.2-8.5%) to 35.1% (32.6-37.7%), and from 17.9% (15.5-20.6%) to 56.9% (53.5-60.3%) in the 1st quintile (lowest rates of follow-up) and 5th quintile (highest rates of follow-up) of physicians after negative colonoscopy, low-risk adenoma and high-risk adenoma detection, respectively. Conclusions: This study suggests substantial inter-physician variation in follow-up habits after screening colonoscopy. Interventions, including organizational changes in CRC screening should be considered to reduce this variation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Surveillance after polypectomy and after resection of colorectal cancer
    Arditi, C.
    Gonvers, J. -J.
    Burnand, B.
    Minoli, G.
    Oertli, D.
    Lacaine, F.
    Dubois, R. W.
    Vader, J. -P.
    Filliettaz, S. Schussele
    Peytremann-Bridevaux, I.
    Pittet, V.
    Juillerat, P.
    Froehlich, F.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (03) : 209 - 217
  • [2] Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Detection and Removal of Adenomas at Colonoscopy: Population-Based Case-Control Study
    Brenner, Hermann
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Rickert, Alexander
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (24) : 2969 - 2976
  • [3] Long-Term Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Negative Colonoscopy
    Brenner, Hermann
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (28) : 3761 - 3767
  • [4] Protection From Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy A Population-Based, Case-Control Study
    Brenner, Hermann
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    Rickert, Alexander
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 154 (01) : 22 - U156
  • [5] Process quality indicators in a series of 145,401 outpatient colonoscopies
    Crispin, A.
    Birkner, Berndt R.
    Mansmann, Ulrich
    Munte, A.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB311 - AB311
  • [6] Process quality and incidence of acute complications in a series of more than 230 000 outpatient colonoscopies
    Crispin, A.
    Birkner, B.
    Munte, A.
    Nusko, G.
    Mansmann, U.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (12) : 1018 - 1025
  • [7] Sex-Specific Prevalence of Adenomas, Advanced Adenomas, and Colorectal Cancer in Individuals Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy
    Ferlitsch, Monika
    Reinhart, Karoline
    Pramhas, Sibylle
    Wiener, Caspar
    Gal, Orsolya
    Bannert, Christina
    Hassler, Michaela
    Kozbial, Karin
    Dunkler, Daniela
    Trauner, Michael
    Weiss, Werner
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 306 (12): : 1352 - 1358
  • [8] Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy in the Medicare Population
    Goodwin, James S.
    Singh, Amanpal
    Reddy, Nischita
    Riall, Taylor S.
    Kuo, Yong-Fang
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 171 (15) : 1335 - 1343
  • [9] Prevalence of Adenomas and Colorectal Cancer in Average Risk Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Ronksley, Paul E.
    Hilsden, Robert J.
    Manns, Braden J.
    Rostom, Alaa
    Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 7 (12) : 1272 - 1278
  • [10] Contrasting US and European approaches to colorectal cancer screening: which is best?
    Hoff, Geir
    Dominitz, Jason A.
    [J]. GUT, 2010, 59 (03) : 407 - 414