Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pancreatitis: Evaluation of signal intensity and enhancement changes

被引:36
作者
Sica, GT [1 ]
Miller, FH [1 ]
Rodriguez, G [1 ]
McTavish, J [1 ]
Banks, PA [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
pancreas; MR; pancreatitis; magnetic resonance (MR); comparative studies; computed tomography (CT); tissue characterization;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.10066
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the utility of unenhanced and enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed (T1-FS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting pancreatitis. Materials and Methods: 1.5-T MRI was performed in 25 patients with acute and 23 patients with chronic pancreatitis and in 20 control subjects without known pancreatic disease. T1-FS spin-echo and contrast-enhanced arterial-predominant (DYN1) and portal-predominant (DYN2) fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo (FMPSPGR) sequences were evaluated. These three sets of images were evaluated both subjectively for decreased or heterogeneous signal intensity (rating scale, 0-3) and objectively (region of interest (ROI)) in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas, in each patient. Results: Good correlation between subjective assessment and objective data was demonstrated. The T1-FS sequence showed an abnormality with greater frequency (T1-FS > DYN1, 8 1/144 scores; T1 - FS = DYN1, 63/144 scores; T1-FS < DYN1, 0/144 scores) and magnitude (average subjective score, 2.48 vs. 1.74; P < 0.0003) than that of the contrast-enhanced FMPSPGR (decreased or heterogeneous enhancement). The overall sensitivity and specificity of MRI was 92% and 50%, respectively. On the basis of signal intensity and enhancement, MRI was not able to differentiate acute from chronic pancreatitis. Conclusion: MRI was highly sensitive for disease detection, particularly using the T1-FS sequence, but using the sequences described, was not able to differentiate acute from chronic pancreatitis.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 284
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF CT [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
RANSON, JHC ;
NAIDICH, DP ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
CACCAVALE, R ;
COOPER, MM .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 156 (03) :767-772
[2]   CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - IS IT BENEFICIAL OR HARMFUL [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
FREENY, PC .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 106 (01) :259-262
[3]   Chronic pancreatitis:: Evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation [J].
Cappeliez, O ;
Delhaye, M ;
Devière, J ;
Le Moine, O ;
Metens, T ;
Nicaise, N ;
Cremer, M ;
Stryuven, J ;
Matos, C .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) :358-364
[4]   VALUE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS OF ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF 202 PATIENTS [J].
CLAVIEN, PA ;
HAUSER, H ;
MEYER, P ;
ROHNER, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 155 (03) :457-466
[5]   Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis: CT vs APACHE II [J].
DeSanctis, JT ;
Lee, MJ ;
Gazelle, GS ;
Boland, GW ;
Halpern, EF ;
Saini, S ;
Mueller, PR .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (11) :842-848
[6]   MR imaging of pancreatic lesions - Comparison of manganese-DPDP and gadolinium chelate [J].
Diehl, SJ ;
Lehmann, KJ ;
Gaa, J ;
McGill, S ;
Hoffmann, V ;
Georgi, M .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (09) :589-595
[7]  
FERUCCI JT, 1979, RADIOLOGY, V130, P175
[8]   INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST-MEDIUM ACCENTUATES THE SEVERITY OF ACUTE NECROTIZING PANCREATITIS IN THE RAT [J].
FOITZIK, T ;
BASSI, DG ;
SCHMIDT, J ;
LEWANDROWSKI, KB ;
FERNANDEZDELCASTILLO, C ;
RATTNER, DW ;
WARSHAW, AL .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 106 (01) :207-214
[9]  
HESSEL SJ, 1982, RADIOLOGY, V188, P593
[10]   ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - CLINICAL VS CT FINDINGS [J].
HILL, MC ;
BARKIN, J ;
ISIKOFF, MB ;
SILVERSTEIN, W ;
KALSER, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 139 (02) :263-269