Results of endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy in recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis

被引:70
|
作者
Cho, Do-Yeon [1 ]
Hwang, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sch Med, Div Rhinol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY | 2008年 / 22卷 / 06期
关键词
Antrostomy; chronic sinusitis; endoscopic sinus surgery; maxillary sinusitis; mucociliary clearance; recalcitrant sinusitis; revision sinus surgery;
D O I
10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3248
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: In patients with chronically diseased maxillary sinuses, poor mucociliary clearance may result front long-standing inflammation or scarring from previous surgery. This subset of patients often has persistent sinus disease despite medical therapy and adequate antrostomy. Endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy (EMMA) is a mucosal sparing technique that facilitates mucus clearance and sinus irrigation in terminally dysfunctional maxillary sinuses. EMMA involves extending the antrostomy through the posterior half of the inferior turbinate down to the floor of the nose, creating a significantly enlarged antrostomy. This study describes our results of EMMA in recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent EMMA for recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis between July 2005 and September 2007, We studied diagnoses, comorbid factors, clinical efficacy, revision rate, and complications. Results: Twenty-eight patients (average age, 48 years) underwent 42 EMMAs for recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. Average follow-up was 11 months. All patients had previous maxillary sinus surgery (mean = 2.3). Relevant comorbid factors included prior Caldwell-Luc or maxillofacial surgery (16142), cystic fibrosis (11/42), asthma (11/42), and IgG deficiency (3142). The most common symptoms reported were facial pain/pressure and purulent rhinorrhea. At the time of the most recent postoperative examination, 74% of patients reported complete resolution of symptoms while 26% reported partial symptomatic improvement. There were no complications and the revision rate was 0%. Conclusion: Maxillary sinuses that appear to be terminally diseased may be rehabilitated surgically without the need for surgical stripping. EMMA is an effective and safe treatment option for the management of recalcitrant maxillary sinus disease.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 662
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term outcomes of endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy for refractory chronic maxillary sinusitis
    Costa, Milena L.
    Psaltis, Alkis J.
    Nayak, Jayakar V.
    Hwang, Peter H.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2015, 5 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [2] Endoscopic antrostomy in the treatment of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis - two cases report
    Dimic, Aleksandar
    Brkovic, Bozidar
    Erdoglija, Milan
    Grgurevic, Ugljesa
    Sotirovic, Jelena
    Rasic, Dejan
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2018, 75 (11) : 1123 - 1127
  • [3] Modified endoscopic medial maxillectomy for recalcitrant chronic maxillary sinusitis
    Wang, Eric W.
    Gullung, Jessica L.
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2011, 1 (06) : 493 - 497
  • [4] The Combined Middle and Inferior Antrostomy for Fungal Maxillary Sinusitis Treatment
    Cong Van Ngo
    Hoang Nguyen
    Joseph Aklinski
    Dung My Thi Nguyen
    Hoang Huy Le
    Trang Thi Bich Le
    Hien Quang Nguyen
    Hong-Han Huynh
    Le Huu Hanh Nhi
    Le Huu Nhat Minh
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2023, 75 : 2850 - 2855
  • [5] The Combined Middle and Inferior Antrostomy for Fungal Maxillary Sinusitis Treatment
    Van Ngo, Cong
    Nguyen, Hoang
    Aklinski, Joseph
    Nguyen, Dung My Thi
    Le, Hoang Huy
    Le, Trang Thi Bich
    Nguyen, Hien Quang
    Huynh, Hong-Han
    Nhi, Le Huu Hanh
    Minh, Le Huu Nhat
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2023, 75 (04) : 2850 - 2855
  • [6] Treatment of Recalcitrant Maxillary Sinusitis With Endoscopic Modified Medial Maxillectomy: A Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy
    Loftus, Catherine A.
    Yoo, Frederick
    Desiato, Vincent M.
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    Soler, Zachary M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2020, 34 (01) : 127 - 133
  • [7] Maxillary Antrostomy Versus Complete Sinus Surgery for Odontogenic Sinusitis With Frontal Sinus Extension
    Craig, John R.
    Saibene, Alberto M.
    Adappa, Nithin D.
    Douglas, Jennifer E.
    Eide, Jacob G.
    Felisati, Giovanni
    Kohanski, Michael A.
    Kshirsagar, Rijul S.
    Kwiecien, Catherine
    Lee, Daniel
    Makary, Chadi A.
    Palmer, James N.
    Ray, Amrita
    Wilson, Carl
    Kuan, Edward C.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2025, 135 (02) : 586 - 592
  • [8] Evaluation of Recurrent Maxillary Sinusitis due to Middle Meatal Antrostomy Site Stenosis
    Kim, Hyo Jun
    Choi, Ji Ho
    Lee, Jae Yong
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 129 (10) : 964 - 968
  • [9] A Comparative Study Between Endoscopic Middle Meatal Antrostomy and Caldwell-Luc Surgery in the Treatment of Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis
    K. Joe Jacob
    Shibu George
    S. Preethi
    V. S. Arunraj
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2011, 63 : 214 - 219
  • [10] A Comparative Study Between Endoscopic Middle Meatal Antrostomy and Caldwell-Luc Surgery in the Treatment of Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis
    Jacob, K. Joe
    George, Shibu
    Preethi, S.
    Arunraj, V. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2011, 63 (03) : 214 - 219