Autonomy Challenges in Epigenetic Risk-Stratified Cancer Screening: How Can Patient Decision Aids Support Informed Consent?

被引:9
作者
Alblas, Maaike [1 ]
Schermer, Maartje [2 ]
Vergouwe, Yvonne [1 ]
Bolt, Ineke [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, PO 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Med Eth & Philosophy Med, PO 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
cancer screening programmes; epigenetics; risk prediction; patient autonomy; informed consent; patient decision aids; HEALTH-CARE; OPPORTUNITIES; RATIONALE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/jpm9010014
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Information of an individual's epigenome can be useful in cancer screening to enable personalised decision making on participation, treatment options and further screening strategies. However, adding this information might result in complex risk predictions on multiple diseases, unsolicited findings and information on (past) environmental exposure and behaviour. This complicates informed consent procedures and may impede autonomous decision-making. In this article we investigate and identify the specific features of epigenetic risk-stratified cancer screening that challenge the current informed consent doctrine. Subsequently we describe current and new informed consent models and the principle of respect for autonomy and argue for a specific informed consent model for epigenetic risk-stratified screening programmes. Next, we propose a framework that guides the development of Patient Decision Aids (PDAs) to support informed consent and promote autonomous choices in the specific context of epigenetic cancer screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Informed Consent: Its History, Meaning, and Present Challenges [J].
Beauchamp, Tom L. .
CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 2011, 20 (04) :515-523
[2]   Informed Consent Is Inadequate and Shared Decision Making Is Ineffective: Arguing for the Primacy of Authenticity in Decision-Making Paradigms [J].
Berger, Jeffrey T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2017, 17 (11) :45-47
[3]   Unsolicited findings of next-generation sequencing for tumor analysis within a Dutch consortium: clinical daily practice reconsidered [J].
Bijlsma, Rhode M. ;
Bredenoord, Annelien L. ;
Gadellaa-Hooijdonk, Christa G. ;
Lolkema, Martijn P. J. ;
Sleijfer, Stefan ;
Voest, Emile E. ;
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. ;
Steeghs, Neeltje .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2016, 24 (10) :1496-1500
[4]   Multiplex genetic testing: reconsidering utility and informed consent in the era of next-generation sequencing [J].
Bradbury, Angela R. ;
Patrick-Miller, Linda ;
Domchek, Susan .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (02) :97-98
[5]   INFORMED CONSENT IN DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER PERSONAL GENOME TESTING: THE OUTLINE OF A MODEL BETWEEN SPECIFIC AND GENERIC CONSENT [J].
Bunnik, Eline M. ;
Janssens, A. Cecile J. W. ;
Schermer, Maartje H. N. .
BIOETHICS, 2014, 28 (07) :343-351
[6]   A tiered-layered-staged model for informed consent in personal genome testing [J].
Bunnik, Eline M. ;
Janssens, A. Cecile J. W. ;
Schermer, Maartje H. N. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2013, 21 (06) :596-601
[7]   Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T ;
O'Brien, MA .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2005, 8 (02) :114-125
[8]  
[Curry Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Institute of Medicine of the National Academies], 2003, FULFILLING POTENTIAL
[9]   Combining deliberation and intuition in patient decision support [J].
de Vries, Marieke ;
Fagerlin, Angela ;
Witteman, Holly O. ;
Scherer, Laura D. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 91 (02) :154-160
[10]   FROM DRUG AND THERAPEUTICS BULLETIN An introduction to patient decision aids [J].
不详 .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347