Is magnetic resonance imaging becoming the new computed tomography for cervical spine clearance? Trends in magnetic resonance imaging utilization at a Level I trauma center

被引:2
|
作者
Huang, Raymond [1 ]
Ryu, Robert C. [2 ]
Kim, Terrence T. [2 ]
Alban, Rodrigo F. [1 ]
Margulies, Daniel R. [1 ]
Ley, Eric J. [1 ]
Barmparas, Galinos [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Acute Care Surg & Surg Crit Care, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
Cervical spine clearance; blunt trauma; MRI; neurologic deficit; overutilization; BLUNT TRAUMA; INJURY; METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; PATIENT; SCAN; RULE;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000002752
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Increasing evidence supports the limited use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for cervical spine (C-spine) clearance following blunt trauma. We sought to characterize the utilization of MRI of the C-spine at a Level I trauma center. METHODS All blunt trauma patients undergoing a computed tomography (CT) of the C-spine between January 2009 and December 2018 were reviewed. The CT and MRI results, demographics, clinical presentation, subspecialty consultations, and interventions were recorded. The MRI results were considered clinically significant if they resulted in cervical thoracic orthosis/halo placement or surgical intervention. Linear regression models were utilized to identify trends. RESULTS There were 9,101 patients that underwent a CT of the C-spine, with 513 (5.6%) being positive for an acute injury. MRI was obtained for 375 (4.1%) of patients. A linear increase in the proportion of patients undergoing an MRI was noted, from 0.9% in 2009 to 5.6% in 2018 (p < 0.01). Of the 513 patients with a positive CT, 290 (56.5%) had an MRI. In 40 (13.8%) of them, the CT demonstrated a minor injury. Clinically significant MRI findings were noted only in two (5.0%) of the 40 patients, and both had a neurologic deficit on initial examination. Of the 8,588 patients with a negative CT, 85 (1.0%) underwent an MRI. Of those, 9 (10.6%) had a clinically significant MRI with all but one presenting with a neurological deficit. CONCLUSION MRI is increasingly utilized for C-spine clearance following blunt trauma. MRI was exceedingly unlikely to demonstrate a clinically significant finding in the absence of a neurological deficit, when the CT was negative or included minor injuries. Trauma centers are encouraged to constantly evaluate their own practices and intervene with education and collaboration to limit the excessive use of unnecessary resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management Study, Level III or IV. Diagnostic test, level IV.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 370
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Computed Tomography Evidence of Trauma in Adults: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prognostic Factors
    Martinez-Perez, Rafael
    Munarriz, Pablo M.
    Paredes, Igor
    Cotrina, Javier
    Lagares, Alfonso
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 99 : 192 - 199
  • [22] The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in addition to computed tomography scans in the evaluation of cervical spine injuries: a study of obtunded blunt trauma patients
    Lau, Bernard Puang Huh
    Hey, Hwee Weng Dennis
    Lau, Eugene Tze-Chun
    Nee, Pei Yi
    Tan, Kimberly-Anne
    Tan, Wah Tze
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (05) : 1028 - 1033
  • [23] Utility of Adding Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Computed Tomography Alone in the Evaluation of Cervical Spine Injury: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Tobert, Daniel G.
    Le, Hai V.
    Leonard, Dana A.
    Yau, Allan L.
    Rajan, Prashant
    Cho, Charles H.
    Kang, James D.
    Bono, Christopher M.
    Harris, Mitchel B.
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (03) : 179 - 184
  • [24] Magnetic resonance imaging cervical spine in trauma: A retrospective single-centre audit of patient outcomes
    Foster, Grant
    Russell, Brigitte
    Hibble, Belinda
    Shaw, Kevin
    Stella, Julian
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2022, 34 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [25] The value of cervical magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the obtunded or comatose patient with cervical trauma, no other abnormal neurological findings, and a normal cervical computed tomography
    Khanna, Pavan
    Chau, Cam
    Dublin, Arthur
    Kim, Kee
    Wisner, David
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 72 (03) : 699 - 702
  • [26] Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Ligamentous Injury in Cervical Spine Trauma: A 2-Year Consecutive Case Cohort
    Avila, Mauricio J.
    Dumont, Travis M.
    Ganapathy, Venkat
    Hurlbert, R. John
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 183 : E339 - E344
  • [27] Computed Tomography versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluation of the Cervical Spine: How Many Slices Do You Need?
    Brown, Carlos V. R.
    Foulkrod, Kelli H.
    Reifsnyder, Andrew
    Bui, Eric
    Lopez, Irene
    Hummell, Matthew
    Coopwood, Ben
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2010, 76 (04) : 365 - 368
  • [28] Should I irradiate with computed tomography or sedate for magnetic resonance imaging?
    Callahan, Michael J.
    Cravero, Joseph P.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 52 (02) : 340 - 344
  • [29] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Atlas of the Cervical Spine Musculature
    Au, John
    Perriman, Diana M.
    Pickering, Mark R.
    Buirski, Graham
    Smith, Paul N.
    Webb, Alexandra L.
    CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2016, 29 (05) : 643 - 659
  • [30] Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine in 27 dogs
    Levitski, RE
    Lipsitz, D
    Chauvet, AE
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 1999, 40 (04) : 332 - 341