Cost-benefit analysis of multifunctional agriculture in Finland

被引:2
|
作者
Yrjölä, T [1 ]
Kola, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Econ & Management, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
来源
AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD SCIENCE IN FINLAND | 2001年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
multifunctional agriculture; non-market benefits; externalities; cost-benefit analysis; Finland;
D O I
10.23986/afsci.5706
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This study aims at assessing the costs and benefits of multifunctional agriculture, and it is one of the very first studies using a quantitative approach to this new subject. The starting point is that if current farm subsidies are regarded as means to maintain the multifunctional characteristics of agriculture, what happens if subsidies are reduced. The effects of the decline in agricultural support on multifunctional characteristics of agriculture in Finland are estimated using the cost-benefit analysis (CBA). Only a part of the consequences can be assessed by the CBA due to lack of data on the economic value of many elements of multifunctional agriculture. Hence, the results should not be generalised too strongly, but they still provide useful information for the political decision-making. Concerning further research, we should study, inter alia, what the so-called correct level of compensation for the adequate supply of public goods would be, and what kind of means of agricultural policy are the most efficient to unambiguously enhance the multifunctional character of agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 307
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-benefit analysis of using biochar to improve cereals agriculture
    Dickinson, Dane
    Balduccio, Ludovico
    Buysse, Jeroen
    Ronsse, Frederik
    van Huylenbroeck, Guido
    Prins, Wolter
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2015, 7 (04): : 850 - 864
  • [2] Methodological Challenges in Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Voros, Tunde
    PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY-HUNGARY, 2018, 63 (03): : 402 - 423
  • [3] The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It
    Flyvbjerg, Bent
    Bester, Dirk W.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 395 - 419
  • [4] Liraglutide: A Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Schoeffski, O.
    Mentrup, S.
    Lund, N.
    Pfuetzner, A.
    DIABETES STOFFWECHSEL UND HERZ, 2010, 19 (03): : 177 - 184
  • [5] Cost-benefit analysis: examples
    Linn, Mott
    BOTTOM LINE, 2011, 24 (01) : 68 - 72
  • [6] Pediatric cost-benefit analysis
    Schulze-Gattermann, H
    Illg, A
    Lesinski-Schiedat, A
    Schoenermark, M
    Bertram, B
    Lenarz, T
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2003, 82 (05) : 322 - 329
  • [7] Cost-benefit analysis of transport investments in distorted economies
    Calthrop, Edward
    De Borger, Bruno
    Proost, Stef
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2010, 44 (07) : 850 - 869
  • [8] Promoting biofuels use in Spain: A cost-benefit analysis
    Santamaria, Marta
    Azqueta, Diego
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 : 1415 - 1424
  • [9] Value Typology in Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Baum, Seth D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2012, 21 (04) : 499 - 524
  • [10] Cost-benefit analysis of plasma-based technologies
    Blumberga, Andra
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    Pubule, Jelena
    Romagnoli, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, CONECT 2014, 2015, 72 : 170 - 174