Liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients

被引:60
作者
Cagnoni, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Ctr Canc, Denver, CO 80262 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jac/49.suppl_1.81
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Liposomal amphotercin B was compared with conventional amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial. Using a composite end-point, the two drugs were equivalent in overall efficacy. However, the liposomal amphotericin B treatment group had fewer proven fungal infections, fewer infusion-related side effects and less nephrotoxicity. Patient data from that study were analysed to compare the pharmacoeconomics of liposomal versus conventional amphotericin B therapy. Itemized billing data from 414 patients were collected and analysed. Hospital costs from first dose were significantly higher for all patients who received liposomal amphotericin B ($48962 versus $43183, P=0.02). However, hospital costs were very sensitive to the cost of the study medication ($39648 versus $43048, when acquisition costs are not included, P=0.4). Using decision analysis models and sensitivity analyses to vary the cost of study medications and risk of nephrotoxicity, the break-even points for the cost of liposomal therapy were calculated to range from $72 to $87 per 50 mg for all patients, and $83 to $112 per 50 mg in allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients. Therefore, the drug acquisition costs and the risk of nephrotoxicity are important factors in determining the cost-effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy in persistently febrile neutropenic patients. In a recent randomized double-blind study comparing liposomal amphotericin B at 3 or 5 mg/kg/day with amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) 5 mg/kg/day as empirical antifungal treatment in patients with febrile neutropenia, liposomal amphotericin B was associated with less toxicity than ABLC, both in terms of infusion-related reactions and nephrotoxicity. The incidence of study drug discontinuation due to toxicity was: liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg/day, 14%; liposomal amphotericin B 5 mg/kg/day, 15%; and ABLC, 42% (P<0.001).
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 86
页数:6
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]   Pharmacoeconomic analysis of liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients [J].
Cagnoni, PJ ;
Walsh, TJ ;
Prendergast, MM ;
Bodensteiner, D ;
Hiemenz, S ;
Greenberg, RN ;
Arndt, CAS ;
Schuster, M ;
Seibel, N ;
Yeldandi, V ;
Tong, KB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (12) :2476-2483
[2]   SYSTEMICALLY ADMINISTERED ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS - A REVIEW OF THEIR CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS [J].
LYMAN, CA ;
WALSH, TJ .
DRUGS, 1992, 44 (01) :9-35
[3]   Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia [J].
Walsh, TJ ;
Finberg, RW ;
Arndt, C ;
Hiemenz, J ;
Schwartz, C ;
Bodensteiner, D ;
Pappas, P ;
Seibel, N ;
Greenberg, RN ;
Dummer, S ;
Schuster, M ;
Holcenberg, JS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (10) :764-771
[4]   A randomized, double-blind comparative trial evaluating the safety of liposomal amphotericin B versus amphotericin B lipid complex in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia [J].
Wingard, JR ;
White, MH ;
Anaissie, E ;
Raffalli, J ;
Goodman, J ;
Arrieta, A .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 31 (05) :1155-1163