Detecting relevant changes and responsiveness of Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Neck Disability Index

被引:86
作者
Jorritsma, Wim [1 ]
Dijkstra, Pieter U. [1 ,2 ]
de Vries, Grietje E. [3 ]
Geertzen, Jan H. B. [1 ]
Reneman, Michiel F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Rehabil, Dept Rehabil Med, NL-9750 RA Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, NL-9750 RA Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pulm Med & TB, NL-9750 RA Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Clinically important change; Neck disability questionnaires; Non-specific neck pain; Disability; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; RATING-SCALE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY; FUNCTIONAL SCALE; OUTCOME MEASURES; SPINE SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-012-2407-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
To investigate relevant change on the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) and which questionnaire is the most responsive in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain (CNP). Seventy-six patients with non-specific CNP in an outpatient tertiary rehabilitation setting were dichotomized into "improved" and "stable" based on global perceived effect (GPE) scores. To investigate relevant change minimal detectable change (MDC) and minimal important change (MIC) with the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) cut-off point were assessed. Comparison of responsiveness was performed using areas under the ROC curve (AUC) and correlations between change scores of NPAD and NDI, and GPE. MDC and MIC on NPAD (scale 0-100) were 31.7 and 11.5 points, respectively. MDC and MIC on NDI (scale 0-50) were 8.4 and 3.5 points, respectively. Changes should exceed this MDC or MIC cut-off to be interpreted as relevant. AUC was 0.75 for both NPAD and NDI. Correlations between change scores of NPAD and NDI, and GPE were, respectively, 0.48 (95 % CI 0.29-0.64) and 0.49 (95 % CI 0.30-0.64). Relevant change on both NPAD and NDI assessed with MDC and MIC resulted in different cut-offs and consequently with different amounts of certainty that the patient is improved. Responsiveness of NPAD and NDI was similar.
引用
收藏
页码:2550 / 2557
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3192-3199
[2]   The neck [J].
Bogduk, N .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) :261-285
[3]   Sensitivity and specificity of outcome measures in patients with neck pain: Detecting clinically significant improvement [J].
Bolton, JE .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (21) :2410-2417
[4]   The neck pain and disability scale - Cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties in chronic neck pain and C1-2 fusion patients [J].
Bremerich, Friedrich H. ;
Grob, Dieter ;
Dvorak, Jiri ;
Mannion, Anne F. .
SPINE, 2008, 33 (09) :1018-1027
[5]   Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion [J].
Carreon, Leah Y. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Campbell, Mitchell J. ;
Anderson, Paul A. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (06) :469-474
[6]   The reliability and construct validity of the neck disability index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy [J].
Cleland, JA ;
Fritz, JM ;
Whitman, JM ;
Palmer, JA .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (05) :598-602
[7]   Psychometric properties of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain [J].
Cleland, Joshua A. ;
Childs, John A. ;
Whitman, Julie M. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (01) :69-74
[8]   Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Berven, Sigurd ;
Schuler, Thomas C. ;
Carreon, Leah Y. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (06) :968-974
[9]   Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Schuler, Thomas C. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (05) :541-546
[10]   Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life [J].
Crosby, RD ;
Kolotkin, RL ;
Williams, GR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (05) :395-407