Addressing a broken peer review process

被引：13

作者：

Hazen, Benjamin T. ^{[1
]}

Fawcett, Stanley E. ^{[2
]}

Ogden, Jeffrey A. ^{[1
]}

Autry, Chad W. ^{[3
]}

Richey, R. Glenn ^{[4
]}

Ellinger, Alexander E. ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Air Force Inst Technol, Dept Operat Sci, Dayton, OH 45433 USA

[2] Weber State Univ, Dept Business Adm, Ogden, UT 84408 USA

[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Mkt & Logist, Knoxville, TN USA

[4] Auburn Univ, Dept Aviat & Supply Chain Management, Auburn, AL 36849 USA

[5] Univ Alabama, Dept Mkt, Tuscaloosa, AL USA

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT | 2016年 / 27卷 / 03期

关键词：

Supply chain management; Community; Peer review; Logistics;

D O I：

10.1108/IJLM-09-2016-0201

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;

摘要：

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to bring awareness to the logistics and supply chain management (L/SCM) community's broken review process. Design/methodology/approach - The authors diagnose some of the core problems that limit the L/SCM community from disseminating high-quality research in a timely manner. Findings - Problems attributable to authors, reviewers, and editors are described, and recommendations for each review process participant are provided. Originality/value - This editorial provides a call for further discussion and action in terms of how the community can improve the contribution to knowledge and society.

引用

页码：622 / 628

页数：7

共 50 条

[31] Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process
Marcoci, Alexandru
Vercammen, Ans
Bush, Martin
Hamilton, Daniel G.
Hanea, Anca
Hemming, Victoria
Wintle, Bonnie C.
Burgman, Mark
Fidler, Fiona
BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2022, 15 (01)
[32] Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
Fox, Charles W.
Burns, C. Sean
Meyer, Jennifer A.
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 30 (01) : 140 - 153
[33] Perceptions of the Peer Review Process in Hospitality and Tourism
Deale, Cynthia S.
Lee, Seung-Hyun
Bae, Stephanie Jung-In
JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY & TOURISM EDUCATION, 2021, 33 (04) : 288 - 298
[34] Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals
Sprowson, A. P.
Rankin, K. S.
McNamara, I.
Costa, M. L.
Rangan, A.
BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2013, 2 (11): : 245 - 247
[35] The peer-review process of the Journal of Neurosurgery
Firlik, KS
Firlik, AD
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 90 (02) : 364 - 370
[36] The peer review process in science education journals
Baker, D
RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2002, 32 (02) : 171 - 180
[37] Improving the peer review process with information technology
Mandviwalla, Munir
Patnayakuni, Ravi
Schuff, David
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2008, 46 (01) : 29 - 40
[38] Peer review of the curriculum as a continuous process of improvement
Marlowe, Karen F.
Wargo, Kurt A.
Kelley, Kristi W.
CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2012, 4 (03) : 157 - 164
[39] What is the sensitivity and specificity of the peer review process?
Garcia, Jose A.
Chamorro-Padial, Jorge
Rodriguez-Sanchez, Rosa
Fdez-Valdivia, J.
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2024, 31 (04): : 305 - 326
[40] Professionalizing Peer Review Suggestions for a More Ethical and Pedagogical Review Process
Sciullo, Nick J.
Duncan, Mike
JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, 2019, 50 (04) : 248 - 264

← 1 2 3 4 5 →