Addressing a broken peer review process

被引:13
|
作者
Hazen, Benjamin T. [1 ]
Fawcett, Stanley E. [2 ]
Ogden, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
Autry, Chad W. [3 ]
Richey, R. Glenn [4 ]
Ellinger, Alexander E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Air Force Inst Technol, Dept Operat Sci, Dayton, OH 45433 USA
[2] Weber State Univ, Dept Business Adm, Ogden, UT 84408 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Mkt & Logist, Knoxville, TN USA
[4] Auburn Univ, Dept Aviat & Supply Chain Management, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[5] Univ Alabama, Dept Mkt, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
关键词
Supply chain management; Community; Peer review; Logistics;
D O I
10.1108/IJLM-09-2016-0201
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to bring awareness to the logistics and supply chain management (L/SCM) community's broken review process. Design/methodology/approach - The authors diagnose some of the core problems that limit the L/SCM community from disseminating high-quality research in a timely manner. Findings - Problems attributable to authors, reviewers, and editors are described, and recommendations for each review process participant are provided. Originality/value - This editorial provides a call for further discussion and action in terms of how the community can improve the contribution to knowledge and society.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 628
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future
    Drozdz, John A.
    Ladomery, Michael R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 81
  • [22] An overview of the peer review process in biomedical sciences
    Miller, Edward
    James Weightman, Michael
    Basu, Ashna
    Amos, Andrew
    Brakoulias, Vlasios
    AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 32 (03) : 247 - 251
  • [23] Applying a fuzzy questionnaire in a peer review process
    Jonas, Tamas
    Toth, Zsuzsanna Eszter
    Arva, Gabor
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2018, 29 (9-10) : 1228 - 1245
  • [24] Understanding the Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers
    Tucker, Katherine
    Davis, Teresa
    Duggan, Christopher
    Odle, Jack
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2023, 79 : 261 - 261
  • [25] The Peer Review Process in Science Education Journals
    Dale Baker
    Research in Science Education, 2002, 32 : 171 - 180
  • [26] Nurse editors' views on the peer review process
    Kearney, MH
    Freda, MC
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2005, 28 (06) : 444 - 452
  • [27] Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process
    Alexandru Marcoci
    Ans Vercammen
    Martin Bush
    Daniel G. Hamilton
    Anca Hanea
    Victoria Hemming
    Bonnie C. Wintle
    Mark Burgman
    Fiona Fidler
    BMC Research Notes, 15
  • [28] Journal peer review as an information retrieval process
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Egghe, Leo
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2012, 68 (04) : 527 - 535
  • [29] Faculty peer review of teaching taskforce: A quantitative descriptive research study for the peer review process
    Jenkins, Emerald
    D'Aoust, Rita
    Elias, Sabrina
    Han, Hae Ra
    Sharps, Phyllis
    Alvarez, Carmen
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 106
  • [30] Peering at the peer review process for conference submissions
    Gardner, Anne
    Willey, Keith
    Jolly, Lesley
    Tibbits, Gregory
    2012 FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2012,