Comparative socio-cultural analysis of risk perception of Carbon Capture and Storage in the European Union

被引:25
作者
Karimi, Farid [1 ]
Toikka, Arho [1 ]
Hukkinen, Janne I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Environm Policy Res Grp, POB 16, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
CCS; National culture; Risk perception; The general public; TECHNOLOGICAL RISKS; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; DIOXIDE CAPTURE; CCS; VALUES; ATTITUDES; SCIENCE; CULTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2016.06.024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The transition to a sustainable energy regime is not just an engineering question, but a social and cultural issue as well. In this paper, we consider one contested technology still in development, Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), from a socio-cultural perspective. CCS is widely deemed to be a necessary bridging technology to a low-carbon economy, but the technology needs to pass considerable hurdles before widespread use. The importance of cultural issues in CCS deployment has been acknowledged, but research on the large-scale cultural patterns is lacking. To fill this knowledge gap, we combine aggregated individual level measurements of technology opinions with indicators that characterize national cultures. We use survey data from a Eurobarometer together with prior cross-cultural data to show that nation-specific cultural issues can be used as a macro-level approximation of public reactions to CCS technology. Public reactions incorporate cultural factors such as the degree of separation between groups, strength of institutions over space, time and social roles, and society's tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity. On the basis of the analysis, we provide a richer frame for analysts wishing to understand why and how societies and societal actors challenge and contest technologies and energy regimes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 122
页数:9
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] A PSYCHOLOGICAL-STUDY OF THE INVERSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED RISK AND PERCEIVED BENEFIT
    ALHAKAMI, AS
    SLOVIC, P
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) : 1085 - 1096
  • [2] ANDERSON J, 2007, ACCSEPT PROJECT SUMM
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, EUR PUBL AW ACC CO2
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, EASY GUIDE FACTOR AN, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315788135
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2010, CULTURES ORG
  • [7] Public preferences to CCS: How does it change across countries?
    Ashworth, Peta
    Einsiedel, Edna
    Howell, Rhys
    Brunsting, Suzanne
    Boughen, Naomi
    Boyd, Amanda
    Shackley, Simon
    Van Bree, Bas
    Jeanneret, Talia
    Stenner, Karen
    Medlock, Jennifer
    Mabon, Leslie
    Feenstra, C. F. J.
    Hekkenberg, Michiel
    [J]. GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 7410 - 7418
  • [8] Siting technological risks: cultural approaches and cross-cultural ethics
    Basta, Claudia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2011, 14 (07) : 799 - 817
  • [9] Bennett LanceW., 1993, POLIT COMMUN, V10, P101, DOI DOI 10.1080/10584609.1993.9962970
  • [10] Cross-cultural differences in risk perception: A model-based approach
    Bontempo, RN
    Bottom, WP
    Weber, EU
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 1997, 17 (04) : 479 - 488