A Note on a Group Preference Axiomatization with Cardinal Utility

被引:14
作者
Dias, Luis C. [1 ,2 ]
Sarabando, Paula [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Fac Econ, P-3004512 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] INESC Coimbra, P-3000033 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Polytech Inst Viseu, P-3504510 Viseu, Portugal
关键词
group utility functions; multiattribute utility theory; additive model; SOCIAL-WELFARE FUNCTIONS; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; AGGREGATION;
D O I
10.1287/deca.1120.0244
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Kenneth Arrow's work on social welfare proposed a set of conditions that a function to aggregate ordinal preferences of the members of a group should satisfy, proving that it was not possible to satisfy all these assumptions simultaneously. Later, Ralph Keeney adapted these conditions and proposed a cardinal utility axiomatization for the problem of aggregating the utility functions. This note discusses in particular the condition of nondictatorship. It proposes stronger formulations for this condition to limit the maximum influence that an individual can have, and it presents the corresponding characterization of compliant group cardinal utility functions. An extension to address coalitions of individuals acting strategically is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 237
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1970, Social choice and individual values
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
[3]   Group decisions with multiple criteria [J].
Baucells, M ;
Sarin, RK .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (08) :1105-1118
[4]   Multi-attribute utility methods in group decision making: Past applications and potential for inclusion in GDSS [J].
Bose, U ;
Davey, AM ;
Olson, DL .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 25 (06) :691-706
[5]   Relative utilitarianism [J].
Dhillon, A ;
Mertens, JF .
ECONOMETRICA, 1999, 67 (03) :471-498
[6]   GROUP-PREFERENCE AGGREGATION RULES BASED ON STRENGTH OF PREFERENCE [J].
DYER, JS ;
SARIN, RK .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1979, 25 (09) :822-832
[7]   MANIPULATION OF VOTING SCHEMES - GENERAL RESULT [J].
GIBBARD, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1973, 41 (04) :587-601
[8]   CARDINAL WELFARE, INDIVIDUALISTIC ETHICS, AND INTERPERSONAL COMPARISONS OF UTILITY [J].
Harsanyi, John C. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1955, 63 (04) :309-321
[9]   Aggregation of individuals' preference intensities into social preference intensity [J].
Harvey, CM .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1999, 16 (01) :65-79
[10]  
Keefer DonaldL., 2004, Decision Analysis, V1, P5, DOI 10.1287/DECA.1030.0004