Impact of a structured multidisciplinary intervention on quality of life of older adults with advanced cancer

被引:12
作者
Chock, Megan M. [1 ]
Lapid, Maria I. [2 ]
Atherton, Pamela J. [3 ]
Kung, Simon [2 ]
Sloan, Jeff A. [3 ]
Richardson, Jarrett W. [2 ]
Clark, Matthew M. [2 ]
Rummans, Teresa A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Grad Sch Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Psychiat & Psychol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
well-being; mood; elderly; psycho-oncology; psychosocial; multidisciplinary intervention; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CLINICAL-TRIAL; PERSPECTIVE; VALIDATION; STATES; SCALE; AGE;
D O I
10.1017/S1041610213001452
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: Patients experience reductions in quality of life (QOL) while receiving cancer treatment and several approaches have been proposed to address QOL issues. In this project, the QOL differences between older adult (age 65+) and younger adult (age 18-64) advanced cancer patients in response to a multidisciplinary intervention designed to improve QOL were examined. Methods: This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01360814. Newly diagnosed advanced cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy were randomized to active QOL intervention or control groups. Those in the intervention group received six multidisciplinary 90-minute sessions designed to address the five major domains of QOL. Outcomes measured at baseline and weeks 4, 27, and 52 included QOL (Linear Analogue Self-Assessment (LASA), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)) and mood (Profile of Mood States (POMS)). Kruskall-Wallis methodology was used to compare scores between older and younger adult patients randomized to the intervention. Results: Of 131 patients in the larger randomized controlled study, we report data on 54 evaluable patients (16 older adults and 38 younger adults) randomized to the intervention. Older adult patients reported better overall QOL (LASA 74.4 vs. 62.9, p = 0.040), higher social well-being (FACT-G 91.1 vs. 83.3, p = 0.045), and fewer problems with anger (POMS anger-hostility 95.0 vs. 86.4, p = 0.028). Long-term benefits for older patients were seen in the anger-hostility scale at week 27 (92.2 vs. 84.2, p = 0.027) and week 52 (96.3 vs. 85.9, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Older adult patients who received a multidisciplinary intervention to improve QOL while undergoing advanced cancer treatments benefited differently in some QOL domains, compared to younger adult patients. Future studies can provide further insight on how to tailor QOL interventions for these age groups.
引用
收藏
页码:2077 / 2086
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Perceived Needs, Psychological Distress and Quality of Life of Elderly Cancer Patients
    Akechi, Tatsuo
    Okuyama, Toru
    Uchida, Megumi
    Nakaguchi, Tomohiro
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Yamashita, Hiroko
    Toyama, Tatsuya
    Komatsu, Hirokazu
    Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
    Wada, Makoto
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 42 (08) : 704 - 710
  • [2] Ambs A, 2008, HEALTH CARE FINANC R, V29, P5
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, NATL VITAL STAT REPO
  • [4] [Anonymous], ISRN NURSING 2011
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, CURRENT POPULATION R
  • [6] Quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: A population-based study
    Arndt, V
    Merx, H
    Stegmaier, C
    Ziegler, H
    Brenner, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (23) : 4829 - 4836
  • [7] Berger NA, 2006, T AM CLIN CLIMAT ASS, V117, P155
  • [8] Berger Nathan A, 2006, Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc, V117, P147
  • [9] A gerontologic perspective on cancer and aging
    Blank, Thomas O.
    Bellizzi, Keith M.
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 112 (11) : 2569 - 2576
  • [10] Quality of life in hospice patients -: A pilot study
    Bretscher, M
    Rummans, T
    Sloan, J
    Kaur, J
    Bartlett, A
    Borkenhagen, L
    Loprinzi, C
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1999, 40 (04) : 309 - 313