An international comparative analysis of public acceptance of nuclear energy

被引:109
作者
Kim, Younghwan [1 ]
Kim, Wonjoon [2 ]
Kim, Minki [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Ctr Sci Based Entrepreneurship, Taejon 305701, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Innovat & Technol Management, Dept Business & Technol Management, Taejon 305701, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Public acceptance; Nuclear energy; Reluctant acceptance; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POWER; RISK; MODEL; TRUST; PERCEPTION; SECURITY; CHERNOBYL; ACCIDENT; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.039
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Across the globe, public acceptance of nuclear power is a crucial factor for governmental establishment of a nuclear energy program. Therefore, it is important to understand the determinants of public acceptance of nuclear power. This study examines the effects of knowledge, trust, risk, and benefit related factors on public acceptance of nuclear power across 19 countries. We consider three levels of public acceptance - strongly accept, reluctantly accept, and oppose - and classify countries into four groups according to the ratio of those three levels of public acceptance. Our results indicate that knowledge of nuclear inspection is more effective than trust in inspection authorities in creating stronger public acceptance among people in the countries with a high level of reluctant acceptance and a low level of strong acceptance, while trust in inspection authorities is more important than knowledge of nuclear inspection for the selection between opposition and reluctant acceptance in countries with a low level of reluctant acceptance and a high level of strong acceptance. Without grouping the countries, we found that trust in inspection authorities is crucial for the decision between opposition and reluctant acceptance. Additionally, the generation of electricity has the most positive effect on public acceptance of nuclear power. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 483
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Anderson DL, 2001, J RADIOANAL NUCL CH, V249, P29
[2]   Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies [J].
Assefa, G. ;
Frostell, B. .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2007, 29 (01) :63-78
[3]   Radioiodine Scintigraphy with SPECT/CT: An Important Diagnostic Tool for Thyroid Cancer Staging and Risk Stratification [J].
Avram, Anca M. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (05) :754-764
[4]   Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste [J].
Bickerstaff, K. ;
Lorenzoni, I. ;
Pidgeon, N. F. ;
Poortinga, W. ;
Simmons, P. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (02) :145-169
[5]   Sustainable development and global security [J].
Blinc, Robert ;
Zidansek, Aleksander ;
Slaus, Ivo .
ENERGY, 2007, 32 (06) :883-890
[6]   An empirical study for the direct and indirect links between trust in regulatory institutions and acceptability of hazards [J].
Bronfman, Nicolas C. ;
Vazquez, Esperanza Lopez ;
Dorantes, Gabriel .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2009, 47 (05) :686-692
[7]  
Cha Y.J., 2000, Journal of Risk Research, V3, P321, DOI [10.1080/13669870050132540, DOI 10.1080/13669870050132540]
[8]   Development of the public attitude model toward nuclear power in Korea [J].
Choi, YS ;
Lee, SH ;
Cho, NZ ;
Lee, BW .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 1998, 25 (12) :923-936
[9]   Public's perception and judgment on nuclear power [J].
Choi, YS ;
Kim, JS ;
Lee, BW .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2000, 27 (04) :295-309
[10]   Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: Exploring British public attitudes [J].
Corner, Adam ;
Venables, Dan ;
Spence, Alexa ;
Poortinga, Wouter ;
Demski, Christina ;
Pidgeon, Nick .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (09) :4823-4833