PET plus MR versus PET/CT in the initial staging of head and neck cancer, using a trimodality PET/CT plus MR system

被引：34

作者：

Sekine, Tetsuro ^{[1
,2
]}

Barbosa, Felipe de Galiza ^{[1
]}

Kuhn, Felix P. ^{[3
,4
]}

Burger, Irene A. ^{[1
]}

Stolzmann, Paul ^{[1
,4
]}

Huber, Gerhard F. ^{[5
]}

Kollias, Spyros S. ^{[4
]}

von Schulthess, Gustav K. ^{[1
]}

Veit-Haibach, Patrick ^{[1
,3
]}

Huellner, Martin W. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Zurich, Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Ramistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland

[2] Nippon Med Sch, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan

[3] Univ Zurich, Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Zurich, Switzerland

[4] Univ Zurich, Univ Zurich Hosp, Clin Neuroradiol, Zurich, Switzerland

[5] Univ Zurich, Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Zurich, Switzerland

来源：

CLINICAL IMAGING | 2017年 / 42卷

关键词：

PET/MR; PET/CT; Oncology; Head and neck cancer; ENT surgery; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PULMONARY NODULES; PERINEURAL SPREAD; F-18-FDG PET/MR; CT; LARYNGEAL; INVASION; IMPACT;

D O I：

10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.01.003

中图分类号：

R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;

摘要：

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of PET+MR with PET/CT in the initial staging of head and neck cancer. Materials and methods: Contrast-enhanced PET/CT+MR was performed in 27 patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer. PET/CT and PET+MR were evaluated separately, and the TNM stage and factors influencing treatment were assessed. Results: The TNM staging by PET+MR was comparable to PET/CT (T: p = 0.331, N: p = 0.453, M: p= 0.034). The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of treatment-influencing factors by PET/CT and PET+MR were 0.68/0.99/0.97, and 1.00/1.00/0.99, respectively. Conclusions: Whole-body staging with PET+MR yields at least equal diagnostic accuracy as PET/CT in head and neck cancer. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：232 / 239

页数：8

共 47 条

[1]

[Anonymous], CLIN MOL ANATOMIC IM

[2]

[Anonymous], EUR J NUCL MED MOL I

[3]

[Anonymous], J MAGN RESON IMAGING

[4]

[Anonymous], CLIN NUCL MED

[5]

[Anonymous], HEAD NECK

[6] Head and neck cancer [J].

Argiris, Athanassios ;

Karamouzis, Michalis V. ;

Raben, David ;

Ferris, Robert L. .

LANCET, 2008, 371 (9625) :1695-1709

[7] MR/PET or PET/MRI: does it matter? [J].

Beyer, Thomas ;

Moser, Ewald .

MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (01) :1-4

[8] FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 [J].

Boellaard, Ronald ;

O'Doherty, Mike J. ;

Weber, Wolfgang A. ;

Mottaghy, Felix M. ;

Lonsdale, Markus N. ;

Stroobants, Sigrid G. ;

Oyen, Wim J. G. ;

Kotzerke, Joerg ;

Hoekstra, Otto S. ;

Pruim, Jan ;

Marsden, Paul K. ;

Tatsch, Klaus ;

Hoekstra, Corneline J. ;

Visser, Eric P. ;

Arends, Bertjan ;

Verzijlbergen, Fred J. ;

Zijlstra, Josee M. ;

Comans, Emile F. I. ;

Lammertsma, Adriaan A. ;

Paans, Anne M. ;

Willemsen, Antoon T. ;

Beyer, Thomas ;

Bockisch, Andreas ;

Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia ;

Delbeke, Dominique ;

Baum, Richard P. ;

Chiti, Arturo ;

Krause, Bernd J. .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (01) :181-200

[9] Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR imaging in the head and upper neck area [J].

Boss, Andreas ;

Stegger, Lars ;

Bisdas, Sotirios ;

Kolb, Armin ;

Schwenzer, Nina ;

Pfister, Markus ;

Claussen, Claus D. ;

Pichler, Bernd J. ;

Pfannenberg, Christina .

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (07) :1439-1446

[10] Head and neck malignancy: Is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? [J].

Branstetter, BF ;

Blodgett, TM ;

Zimmer, LA ;

Snyderman, CH ;

Johnson, JT ;

Raman, S ;

Meltzer, CC .

RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) :580-586

← 1 2 3 4 5 →