Prognosis of chronic fatigue in a community-based sample

被引:30
作者
Taylor, RR [1 ]
Jason, LA [1 ]
Curie, CJ [1 ]
机构
[1] De Paul Univ, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60614 USA
来源
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE | 2002年 / 64卷 / 02期
关键词
epidemiology; chronic fatigue; chronic fatigue syndrome; prognosis; follow-up;
D O I
10.1097/00006842-200203000-00016
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: This study examined predictors of fatigue severity and predictors of continued chronic fatigue status at wave 2 follow-up within a random, community-based sample of individuals previously evaluated in a wave 1 prevalence study of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome that originally took place between 1995 and 1997. Methods: Wave 1 data were from a larger community-based prevalence study of chronic fatigue syndrome. In the present study, a second wave of data were collected by randomly selecting a sample of participants from the wave 1 sample of 18,675 adults and readministering a telephone screening questionnaire designed to assess symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome. Results: Findings revealed that wave 1 fatigue severity was a predictor of fatigue severity at wave 2 in the overall sample of individuals with and without chronic fatigue. In the smaller sample of individuals with chronic fatigue, wave 1 fatigue severity, worsening of fatigue with physical exertion, and feeling worse for 24 hours or more after exercise significantly predicted continued chronic fatigue status (vs. improvement) at wave 2 follow-up. Conclusions: These findings underscore the prognostic validity of postexertional malaise in predicting long-term chronic fatigue and also highlight the importance of using population-based, representative random samples when attempting to identify, long-term predictors of chronic fatigue at follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 327
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Understanding Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: An empirical guide to assessment and treatment
[2]  
BAROFSKY I, 1991, REV INFECT DIS, V13, pS94
[3]   OUTCOME AND PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC FATIGUE VS CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME [J].
BOMBARDIER, CH ;
BUCHWALD, D .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 155 (19) :2105-2110
[4]  
Bowling A., 1997, MEASURING HLTH REV Q, V2nd
[5]   Screening for psychiatric disorders in chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome [J].
Buchwald, D ;
Pearlman, T ;
Kith, P ;
Katon, W ;
Schmaling, K .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1997, 42 (01) :87-94
[6]   COGNITIVE BEHAVIOR-THERAPY IN CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME [J].
BUTLER, S ;
CHALDER, T ;
RON, M ;
WESSELY, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1991, 54 (02) :153-158
[7]   DEVELOPMENT OF A FATIGUE SCALE [J].
CHALDER, T ;
BERELOWITZ, G ;
PAWLIKOWSKA, T ;
WATTS, L ;
WESSELY, S ;
WRIGHT, D ;
WALLACE, EP .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1993, 37 (02) :147-153
[8]   THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SELF-PERCEIVED FATIGUE AMONG ADULTS [J].
CHEN, MK .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (01) :74-81
[9]   CHRONIC FATIGUE - RISK-FACTORS FOR SYMPTOM PERSISTENCE IN A 2-1/2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY [J].
CLARK, MR ;
KATON, W ;
RUSSO, J ;
KITH, P ;
SINTAY, M ;
BUCHWALD, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 98 (02) :187-195
[10]   TIRED, WEAK, OR IN NEED OF REST - FATIGUE AMONG GENERAL-PRACTICE ATTENDERS [J].
DAVID, A ;
PELOSI, A ;
MCDONALD, E ;
STEPHENS, D ;
LEDGER, D ;
RATHBONE, R ;
MANN, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 301 (6762) :1199-1202