Review Article: Rethinking Party Politics and the Welfare State - Recent Advances in the Literature

被引:174
作者
Haeusermann, Silja [1 ]
Picot, Georg [2 ]
Geering, Dominik [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Konstanz, Dept Polit & Adm, Constance, Germany
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford Inst Social Policy, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[3] Univ Zurich, Dept Polit Sci, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
COMPETITION; GERMANY; DEMAND; RISKS;
D O I
10.1017/S0007123412000336
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article discusses recent research on party politics and the welfare state that differs from traditional 'partisan politics theory'. The traditional approach states that left-wing and right-wing parties hold contrasting positions on welfare issues, depending on the interests of their respective electorates. This view has recently been challenged by three strands of research, which emphasize (1) the effects of electoral change on parties' policy positions, (2) the role of context, notably electoral institutions, party competition and the configuration of party systems, and (3) the impact of different linkages between parties and electorates (particularistic versus programmatic). The implications of these arguments for the applicability of partisan theory are presented, and theoretical and empirical issues are identified for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 240
页数:20
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] Allan James P., 2004, AM POLIT SCI REV, V48, P496
  • [2] Anderson Karen M., 2003, POLIT SOC, V23, P23
  • [3] [Anonymous], HOW PARTIES ORGANIZE
  • [4] [Anonymous], THE POLITICS OF SOCI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, PENSION REFORM EUROP
  • [6] University challenges - Explaining institutional change in higher education
    Ansell, Ben W.
    [J]. WORLD POLITICS, 2008, 60 (02) : 189 - +
  • [7] Ascoli Ugo, 1984, IL WELFARE STATE IN
  • [8] Ascoli Ugo., 1984, Welfare State all'italiana
  • [9] Baldwin Peter, 1990, THE BOUNDARIES OF WE
  • [10] Becher M, 2011, RES SOCIOL WORK, V22, P181, DOI 10.1108/S0277-2833(2011)000022B009