Early versus late amniotomy for labour induction: a randomized controlled trial

被引:19
作者
Gagnon-Gervais, Karine [1 ,2 ]
Bujold, Emmanuel [3 ]
Iglesias, Marie-Helene [1 ]
Duperron, Louise [1 ]
Masse, Andre [2 ]
Mayrand, Marie-Helene [2 ]
Sansregret, Andree [1 ]
Fraser, William [1 ]
Audibert, Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, CHU St Justine Res Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, CHUM St Luc, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
关键词
Amniotomy; induction; labor;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2012.695819
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the impact of early vs. late amniotomy on delivery mode in women undergoing induction of labor. Study design: 143 women admitted for induction were randomized to early amniotomy (EA, concomitant with the beginning of oxytocin infusion; n = 71) or to late amniotomy (LA, four hours after the beginning of oxytocin; n = 72). Randomization was stratified by parity. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean. Secondary outcomes were duration of labor and intrapartum fever. Results: The cesarean rate was similar between groups (18% vs. 17% among nulliparous; and 3% vs. 0% among parous women, in EA and LA group, respectively). However, EA was associated with shorter oxytocin-to-delivery interval (12 vs. 15 h) and a non-significant decrease in intrapartum fever (3% vs. 25%) than LA in nulliparous women (p = 0.05). Conclusion: For women undergoing oxytocin induction, early amniotomy is associated with shorter labor in nulliparous women with no effect on the risk of cesarean section in both nulliparous and multiparous women.
引用
收藏
页码:2326 / 2329
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]   SPURT RELEASE OF OXYTOCIN DURING SURGICAL INDUCTION OF LABOR IN WOMEN [J].
CHARD, T ;
GIBBENS, GLD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1983, 147 (06) :678-680
[3]   The association between the length of first stage of labor, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor [J].
Cheng, Yvonne W. ;
Delaney, Shani S. ;
Hopkins, Linda M. ;
Caughey, Aaron B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (05) :477.e1-477.e7
[4]   Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates [J].
Heffner, LJ ;
Elkin, E ;
Fretts, RC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (02) :287-293
[5]   The microbiologic effect of digital cervical examination [J].
Imseis, HM ;
Trout, WC ;
Gabbe, SG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (03) :578-580
[6]  
Levy R, 2002, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V109, P168, DOI 10.1016/S1470-0328(02)01137-0
[7]  
Martin J.A., 2009, NATL VITAL STAT REPO
[8]   EARLY VERSUS LATE AMNIOTOMY FOR LABOR INDUCTION - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
MERCER, BM ;
MCNANLEY, T ;
OBRIEN, J ;
RANDAL, L ;
SIBAI, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (04) :1321-1325
[9]  
Nicholson J M, 2009, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V200, p250e1
[10]   Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel [J].
Pennell, C. E. ;
Henderson, J. J. ;
O'Neill, M. J. ;
McCleery, S. ;
Doherty, D. A. ;
Dickinson, J. E. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (11) :1443-1452