Functional interest of an articulating spacer in two-stage infected total knee arthroplasty revision

被引:17
作者
Classen, T. [1 ]
von Knoch, M. [2 ]
Wernsmann, M. [1 ]
Landgraeber, S. [1 ]
Loeer, F. [1 ]
Jaeger, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed, D-45147 Essen, Germany
[2] Hosp Bremerhaven, Dept Orthopaed, Bremerhaven, Germany
关键词
Knee; Total knee arthroplasty; Infection; Two-stage revision; Articulating spacer; REIMPLANTATION; SALVAGE; DEBRIDEMENT; SEPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2014.01.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Deep periprosthetic infection is one of the most serious complications after total knee replacement. The two-stage procedure with implantation of a temporary cement spacer and later reimplantation of a revision total knee prosthesis is an accepted procedural standard. The use of articulating spacers has been proposed to enhance ease of revision and functional results. Patients and methods: Twenty-three patients treated with an articulating spacer were retrospectivelystudied. All patients had undergone a two-stage surgery. The infected prosthesis was explanted and the femoral component was sterilized and re-implanted. On the tibial side a block of gentamicin-loaded bone cement was produced intraoperatively using specially manufactured templates. Eighteen total knee arthroplasty revisions and 5 arthrodesis were finally performed. Results: A total of three (13%) re-infections occurred 5-20 months after revision total knee arthroplastyin a mean followup period of 47 months. Prior to re-implantation, flexion with the articulating spacerranged between 15 and 100 degrees (mean 68 +/- 28 degrees). The average postoperative flexion after re-implantation of total knee replacement was 105 +/- 11 degrees. Conclusion: The articulating spacer used in this study appears to be as effective as the standard procedures in terms of reinfection risk rate and postoperative range of motion recovery. Level of evidence: Level IV. (c) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 412
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   An Articulating Spacer to Treat and Mobilize Patients with Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Anderson, John A. ;
Sculco, Peter K. ;
Heitkemper, Sven ;
Mayman, David J. ;
Bostrom, Mathias P. ;
Sculco, Thomas P. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2009, 24 (04) :631-635
[2]   Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty [J].
Barrack, RL ;
Engh, G ;
Rorabeck, C ;
Sawhney, J ;
Woolfrey, M .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2000, 15 (08) :990-993
[3]  
BOOTH RE, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P57
[4]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[5]   The infected total knee - Management options [J].
Cuckler, JM .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (04) :33-36
[6]   Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection [J].
Emerson, RH ;
Muncie, M ;
Tarbox, TR ;
Higgins, LL .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (404) :132-138
[7]  
Fehring TK, 2000, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P9
[8]   The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements [J].
Haddad, FS ;
Masri, BA ;
Campbell, D ;
McGraw, RW ;
Beauchamp, CP ;
Duncan, CP .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2000, 82B (06) :807-812
[9]  
HARTMAN MB, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P113
[10]  
HOFMANN AA, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P45