Impact of the detection of small for gestational age fetuses on the neonatal prognosis

被引:4
作者
Peyronnet, V [1 ]
Sibiude, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mandelbrot, L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kayem, G. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CHU Louis Mourier, 178 Rue Renouillers, F-92701 Colombes, France
[2] Univ Paris Diderot, 5 Rue Thomas Mann, F-75013 Paris, France
[3] INSERM, U1018, CESP, VIH Pediat, 78 Rue Gen Leclerc, F-94270 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[4] Sorbonne Paris Cite, Hotel Dieu, Ctr Rech Epidemiol & Biostat,CRESS, INSERM,U1153,Equipe Rech Epidemiol Obstet Perinat, 1 Pl Parvis Notre Dame, F-75004 Paris, France
来源
GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE | 2018年 / 46卷 / 02期
关键词
Small for gestational age; Screening; Prognosis; Prematurity; Ultrasound; FETAL BIOMETRY; PREGNANCY; RECOGNITION; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; INFANTS; IMPROVE; TERM;
D O I
10.1016/j.gofs.2017.12.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. - We sought to evaluate whether the antenatal identification of small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses could influence the neonatal and obstetric prognosis. Methods. - This was a retrospective cohort study. All liveborn singleton neonates with a birthweight < 3rd centile, born > 32 weeks of gestation between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012 were included. Fetuses were considered "suspected SGA" when the estimated fetal weight was < 10th centile or when a diagnosis of clinical or ultrasound SGA was explicitly noted in the record. Obstetrical and neonatal follow-up and outcomes of suspected SGA (SGAS group) and non-suspected (SCANS group) were compared, with Chi(2) and the Fisher exact test when appropriate. Results. - Hundred and forty-seven neonates were included. Among these, 54% were suspected SGA before birth. Gestational age was lower (38.5 weeks gestation [WC] vs. 39.6 WG, P < 0.001) and there was a higher preterm birth rate in the SGAS group (10% vs. 0%, P = 0.005). The rate of elective cesarean sections (17% vs. 3%, P = 0.005) was higher in the SGAS group, whereas the rate of nonelective cesarean sections was lower (20% vs. 33%, P = 0.002). Neonatal morbidity was similar in both groups, as well as birth weight. Conclusion. - SGA fetal screening in our cohort was associated with a higher rate of medical intervention and preterm birth without neonatal benefit. Nevertheless, the study's power and methodology are not adequate to reduce the risk of fetal death in utero or severe asphyxia associated with non-identification of a SGA fetus. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 77
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term
    Allen, Victoria M.
    O'Connell, Colleen M.
    Baskett, Thomas F.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (02) : 286 - 294
  • [2] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V113, P451, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819930b0
  • [3] Small for gestational age newborns - does pre-recognition make a difference in pregnancy outcome?
    Aviram, Amir
    Yogev, Yariv
    Bardin, Ron
    Meizner, Israel
    Wiznitzer, Arnon
    Hadar, Eran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (13) : 1520 - 1524
  • [4] Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30-34 weeks
    Bakalis, S.
    Silva, M.
    Akolekar, R.
    Poon, L. C.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (05) : 551 - 558
  • [5] Benzouina Soukayna, 2016, Pan Afr Med J, V23, P197, DOI 10.11604/pamj.2016.23.197.7401
  • [6] Blondel B, 2011, U953 INSERM
  • [7] Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)
    Boers, K. E.
    Vijgen, S. M. C.
    Bijlenga, D.
    van der Post, J. A. M.
    Bekedam, D. J.
    Kwee, A.
    van der Salm, P. C. M.
    van Pampus, M. G.
    Spaanderman, M. E. A.
    de Boer, K.
    Duvekot, J. J.
    Bremer, H. A.
    Hasaart, T. H. M.
    Delemarre, F. M. C.
    Bloemenkamp, K. W. M.
    van Meir, C. A.
    Willekes, C.
    Wijnen, E. J.
    Rijken, M.
    le Cessie, S.
    Roumen, F. J. M. E.
    Thornton, J. G.
    van Lith, J. M. M.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Scherjon, S. A.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341 : c7087
  • [8] DOES ROUTINE ULTRASOUND SCANNING IMPROVE OUTCOME IN PREGNANCY - METAANALYSIS OF VARIOUS OUTCOME MEASURES
    BUCHER, HC
    SCHMIDT, JG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6895): : 13 - 17
  • [9] CNGOF, 2013, REC PRAT CLIN RCIU
  • [10] EFFECT OF PRENATAL ULTRASOUND SCREENING ON PERINATAL OUTCOME
    EWIGMAN, BG
    CRANE, JP
    FRIGOLETTO, FD
    LEFEVRE, ML
    BAIN, RP
    MCNELLIS, D
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (12) : 821 - 827