N0539 phase II trial of fulvestrant and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an aromatase inhibitor: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (now Alliance) trial

被引:4
作者
Tan, W. W. [1 ]
Dueck, A. C. [2 ]
Flynn, P. [3 ]
Steen, P. [4 ]
Anderson, D. [3 ]
Rowland, K. [5 ]
Northfelt, D. [6 ]
Perez, E. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Hematol Oncol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Sect Biostat, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Metro Minnesota CCOP, St Louis Pk, MN USA
[4] Sanford Med Ctr, Fargo, ND USA
[5] Carle Canc Ctr, Urbana, IL USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Div Hematol Oncol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
antiangiogenesis agent; aromatase inhibitor resistance; bevacizumab; estrogen receptor antagonist; fulvestrant; metastatic breast cancer; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; PLUS BEVACIZUMAB; DOUBLE-BLIND; THERAPY; ANASTROZOLE; PROLIFERATION;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdt213
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Based on preclinical studies, the vascular endothelial pathway is an important mechanism for estrogen receptor resistance. We conducted a phase II study of fulvestrant and bevacizumab in patients with aromatase inhibitor pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Patients and methods: A single-stage phase II study was conducted with these objectives: 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, toxic effect, and overall survival. Regimen: 250 mg fulvestrant days 1 and 15 (cycle 1) then day 1 (cycle 2 and beyond) and 10 mg/kg bevacizumab days 1 and 15 of each 4-week cycle. Results: At interim analysis, 20 eligible patients initiated treatment, 11 were progression free and on treatment at 3 months, not meeting the protocol-specified efficacy requirements (at least 12 of 20). Accrual remained open during interim analysis with 36 patients enrolling before final study closure. Among the 33 eligible patients, the median PFS was 6.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.6-10.1 months]. Of the 18 with measurable disease, 4 (22%) patients (95% CI 6% to 48%) had a confirmed tumor response (1 complete, 3 partial). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hypertension 3 (9%) and headache 3 (9%). Conclusions: The fulvestrant/bevacizumab combination is safe and tolerable; however, it did not meet its statistical end point.
引用
收藏
页码:2548 / 2554
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Everolimus in Postmenopausal Hormone-Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
    Baselga, Jose
    Campone, Mario
    Piccart, Martine
    Burris, Howard A., III
    Rugo, Hope S.
    Sahmoud, Tarek
    Noguchi, Shinzaburo
    Gnant, Michael
    Pritchard, Kathleen I.
    Lebrun, Fabienne
    Beck, J. Thaddeus
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Yardley, Denise
    Deleu, Ines
    Perez, Alejandra
    Bachelot, Thomas
    Vittori, Luc
    Xu, Zhiying
    Mukhopadhyay, Pabak
    Lebwohl, David
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (06) : 520 - 529
  • [2] FACT: An Open-Label Randomized Phase III Study of Fulvestrant and Anastrozole in Combination Compared With Anastrozole Alone As First-Line Therapy for Patients With Receptor-Positive Postmenopausal Breast Cancer
    Bergh, Jonas
    Jonsson, Per-Ebbe
    Lidbrink, Elisabet Kerstin
    Trudeau, Maureen
    Eiermann, Wolfgang
    Brattstrom, Daniel
    Lindemann, Justin P. O.
    Wiklund, Fredrik
    Henriksson, Roger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (16) : 1919 - 1925
  • [3] Quality of life in hospice patients -: A pilot study
    Bretscher, M
    Rummans, T
    Sloan, J
    Kaur, J
    Bartlett, A
    Borkenhagen, L
    Loprinzi, C
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1999, 40 (04) : 309 - 313
  • [4] Double-blind, Randomized placebo controlled trial of fulvestrant compared with exemestane after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer: Results from EFECT
    Chia, Stephen
    Gradishar, William
    Mauriac, Louis
    Bines, Jose
    Amant, Frederic
    Federico, Miriam
    Fein, Luis
    Romieu, Gilles
    Buzdar, Aman
    Robertson, John F. R.
    Brufsky, Adam
    Possinger, Kurt
    Rennie, Pamela
    Sapunar, Francisco
    Lowe, Elizabeth
    Piccart, Martine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (10) : 1664 - 1670
  • [5] Fulvestrant A Review of its Use in the Management of Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
    Croxtall, Jamie D.
    McKeage, Kate
    [J]. DRUGS, 2011, 71 (03) : 363 - 380
  • [6] Final analysis of overall survival for the Phase III CONFIRM trial: fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg
    Di Leo, A.
    Jerusalem, G.
    Petruzelka, L.
    Torres, R.
    Bondarenko, I. N.
    Khasanov, R.
    Verhoeven, D.
    Pedrini, J. L.
    Smirnova, I.
    Lichinitser, M. R.
    Pendergrass, K.
    Garnett, S.
    Rukazenkov, Y.
    Martin, M.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [7] Results of the CONFIRM Phase III Trial Comparing Fulvestrant 250 mg With Fulvestrant 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
    Di Leo, Angelo
    Jerusalem, Guy
    Petruzelka, Lubos
    Torres, Roberto
    Bondarenko, Igor N.
    Khasanov, Rustem
    Verhoeven, Didier
    Pedrini, Jose L.
    Smirnova, Iya
    Lichinitser, Mikhail R.
    Pendergrass, Kelly
    Garnett, Sally
    Lindemann, Justin P. O.
    Sapunar, Francisco
    Martin, Miguel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (30) : 4594 - 4600
  • [8] Fulvestrant for systemic therapy of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a systematic review
    Flemming, Jennifer
    Madarnas, Yolanda
    Franek, Jacob A.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 115 (02) : 255 - 268
  • [9] Comparison of conditional quality of life terminology and visual analogue scale measurements
    Grunberg, SM
    Groshen, S
    Steingass, S
    Zaretsky, S
    Meyerowitz, B
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [10] Health state valuations from the general public using the Visual Analogue Scale
    Gudex, C
    Dolan, P
    Kind, P
    Williams, A
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (06) : 521 - 531