Robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer: A feasible and simplified procedure

被引:6
作者
Chen, Qi-Yue [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhong, Qing [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zheng, Chao-Hui [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Huang, Chang-Ming [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Gastr Surg, Union Hosp, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Minist Educ Gastrointestinal Canc, Key Lab, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Key Lab Tumor Microbiol, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD | 2019年 / 28卷
关键词
Gastric cancer; Robotic surgery; Splenic hilar lymphadenectomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.suronc.2018.11.014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Robotic systems recently have been introduced to overcome technical limitations of conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy, especially for complex procedures [1]. We developed a set of procedural operation steps for robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy, which is difficult and recommended in D2 lymph node (LN) dissection during total gastrectomy [2-4]. Methods: The robotic operative procedures of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy using the da Vinci (R) Si system were demonstrated in a step-by-step manner, with technical tips for each step, in the video clip. The above procedures were performed on 40 consecutive patients with stage cT2-3 proximal gastric cancer between July 2016 and September 2017. The learning curve was analyzed based on the cumulative sum method (CUSUM). Results: The mean age and body mass index of patients were 55.3 +/- 10.4 years (range 29-78) and 23.0 +/- 2.7 kg/m(2) (range 15.4-28.4), respectively. All spleen-preserving surgeries were successfully performed without open or laparoscopy conversion. Mean operation time of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy was 20.3 +/- 6.4 min (range 13.3-46.3); mean blood loss was 13.7 +/- 5.3 ml (range 8.0-40.0). The overall average of 38.8 +/- 13.1 LNs (range 19-81) was retrieved, including a mean 3.3 +/- 1.4 (range 0-8) splenic hilar area LNs, with a 10% (4/40) metastatic rate. No immediate postoperative mortality was observed. 6 patients (15.0%) experienced a complication after surgery; the operation-related complications consisted of one wound complications, one abdominal infection, and one anastomosis leakage. At a median follow-up of 12 months, one patient had experienced lung metastasis. According to the CUSUM, the cut-off point of splenic hilar LN dissection time and blood loss were 15th and 20th cases, respectively. Conclusion: Robotic surgery can improve the quality of surgery and promote the D2 LN dissection. This procedure is feasible and simplifies complicated splenic hilar lymphadenectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 68
页数:2
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]   The effects of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy on the surgical outcome of proximal gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched, case-control study [J].
Huang, Chang-Ming ;
Chen, Tan ;
Lin, Jian-Xian ;
Chen, Qi-Yue ;
Zheng, Chao-Hui ;
Li, Ping ;
Xie, Jian-Wei ;
Wang, Jia-Bin ;
Lu, Jun ;
Cao, Long-Long ;
Lin, Mi ;
Tu, Ru-Hong .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (03) :1383-1392
[2]   Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4) [J].
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2017, 20 (01) :1-19
[3]  
OBAMA K, 2014, ROBOTIC GASTRECTOMY
[4]   Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Splenectomy in Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Carcinoma [J].
Sano, Takeshi ;
Sasako, Mitsuru ;
Mizusawa, Junki ;
Yamamoto, Seiichiro ;
Katai, Hitoshi ;
Yoshikawa, Takaki ;
Nashimoto, Atsushi ;
Ito, Seiji ;
Kaji, Masahide ;
Imamura, Hiroshi ;
Fukushima, Norimasa ;
Fujitani, Kazumasa .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (02) :277-283