Combining multiple socio-cultural approaches-Deeper insights into cultural ecosystem services of mountain lakes?

被引:12
|
作者
Ebner, Manuel [1 ,2 ]
Schirpke, Uta [1 ,2 ]
Tappeiner, Ulrike [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Ecol, Sternwartestrasse 15, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Eurac Res, Inst Alpine Environm, Viale Druso 1, I-39100 Bozen Bolzano, Italy
关键词
Blue Space; Perceptions; Well-being; Mixed methods; European Alps; Non-monetary; HUMAN HEALTH; VALUATION; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGE; RESIDENTS; IMPACT; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104549
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Human interactions with freshwater blue spaces promote various benefits to well-being, which can be framed by the cultural ecosystem services (CES) concept. However, small natural mountain lakes remain scarcely explored in this regard, although a comprehensive understanding of their CES is needed to promote sustainable use. To support landscape management and planning, our aims were therefore to (1) assess multiple elements of human interactions from a CES perspective (i.e., natural assets, relevant CES, benefits to subjective well-being, and pressures/threats) and (2) to evaluate the potential of integrating different socio-cultural approaches in terms of knowledge generation and applicability. By combining an online survey, social media data and participatory stakeholder workshops conducted in the context of the European Alps, we were able to capture social perceptions in quantitative, qualitative, and spatially explicit terms. Complementarity of the approaches was evident, also considering aspects of scalability, social representation, and generalisability of findings. Convergence of findings emphasised the importance of intangible benefits to well-being such as connection to nature, relaxation, and peace, but partly limited the overall information gain. Thus, the integration of socio-cultural approaches can promote more effective knowledge generation, as none of the approaches alone was sufficient to capture all the elements under consideration while yet satisfying all aspects of applicability. To further operationalise the integration of CES into planning processes, future research could aim to quantify human interactions with mountain lakes and associated well-being outcomes, and deepen the understanding of potential conflicts arising from human use of CES as revealed by this study.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perceptions of ecosystem services: Comparing socio-cultural and environmental influences
    Thiemann, Miriam
    Riebl, Rebekka
    Haensel, Maria
    Schmitt, Thomas M.
    Steinbauer, Manuel J.
    Landwehr, Theresa
    Fricke, Ute
    Redlich, Sarah
    Koellner, Thomas
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (10):
  • [2] Cultural ecosystem services nexus with Socio-Cultural attributes and traditional ecological knowledge for managing community forests of indian western Himalaya
    Bhatt, Honey
    Jugran, Harshit Pant
    Pandey, Rajiv
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 166
  • [3] An Analysis of the Worldwide Research on the Socio-Cultural Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services
    Velasco-Munoz, Juan F.
    Aznar-Sanchez, Jose A.
    Schoenemann, Marina
    Lopez-Felices, Belen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [4] Socio-cultural valuation of whale ecosystem services in Skjalfandi Bay, Iceland
    Malinauskaite, Laura
    Cook, David
    Davidsdottir, Brynhildur
    Ogmundardottir, Helga
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 180
  • [5] Ecosystem services in the floodplains: Socio-cultural services associated with ecosystem unpredictability in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil
    Chiaravalloti, Rafael Morais
    Bolzan, Fabio
    Roque, Fabio de Oliveira
    Biswas, Sumalika
    AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM HEALTH & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 25 (01) : 72 - 80
  • [6] An exploration of the relationships between cultural ecosystem services, socio-cultural values and well-being
    Bullock, Craig
    Joyce, Deirdre
    Collier, Marcus
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 31 : 142 - 152
  • [7] Testing socio-cultural valuation methods of ecosystem services to explain land use preferences
    Schmidt, Katja
    Walz, Ariane
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Sachse, Rene
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 26 : 270 - 288
  • [8] Unravelling Diverse Values of Ecosystem Services: A Socio-Cultural Valuation Using Q Methodology in Messenia, Greece
    Maniatakou, Sofia
    Berg, Hakan
    Maneas, Giorgos
    Daw, Tim M.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) : 1 - 25
  • [9] Socio-Cultural Values of Ecosystem Services from Oak Forests in the Eastern Himalaya
    Dorji, Tshewang
    Brookes, Justin D.
    Facelli, Jose M.
    Sears, Robin R.
    Norbu, Tshewang
    Dorji, Kuenzang
    Chhetri, Yog Raj
    Baral, Himlal
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08)
  • [10] Neglected ecosystem services: Highlighting the socio-cultural perception of mangroves in decision-making processes
    de Souza Queiroz, Luciana
    Rossi, Sergio
    Calvet-Mir, Laura
    Ruiz-Mallen, Isabel
    Garcia-Betorz, Sara
    Salva-Prat, Julia
    de Andrade Meireles, Antonio Jeovah
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 26 : 137 - 145