A Comparison of Spatial and Movement Patterns between Sympatric Predators: Bull Sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) and Atlantic Tarpon (Megalops atlanticus)

被引:61
作者
Hammerschlag, Neil [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Jiangang [1 ]
Irschick, Duncan J. [4 ]
Ault, Jerald S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Rosenstiel Sch Marine & Atmospher Sci, Miami, FL 33149 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Leonard & Jayne Abess Ctr Ecosyst Sci & Policy, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[3] Univ Miami, RJ Dunlap Marine Conservat Program, Miami, FL USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Biol, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES; FRACTAL DIMENSION; HABITAT USE; RISK; CONSERVATION; FLORIDA; FISH; OSMOREGULATION; ELASMOBRANCHS; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0045958
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Predators can impact ecosystems through trophic cascades such that differential patterns in habitat use can lead to spatiotemporal variation in top down forcing on community dynamics. Thus, improved understanding of predator movements is important for evaluating the potential ecosystem effects of their declines. Methodology/Principal Findings: We satellite-tagged an apex predator (bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas) and a sympatric mesopredator (Atlantic tarpon, Megalops atlanticus) in southern Florida waters to describe their habitat use, abundance and movement patterns. We asked four questions: (1) How do the seasonal abundance patterns of bull sharks and tarpon compare? (2) How do the movement patterns of bull sharks and tarpon compare, and what proportion of time do their respective primary ranges overlap? (3) Do tarpon movement patterns (e.g., straight versus convoluted paths) and/or their rates of movement (ROM) differ in areas of low versus high bull shark abundance? and (4) Can any general conclusions be reached concerning whether tarpon may mitigate risk of predation by sharks when they are in areas of high bull shark abundance? Conclusions/Significance: Despite similarities in diet, bull sharks and tarpon showed little overlap in habitat use. Bull shark abundance was high year-round, but peaked in winter; while tarpon abundance and fishery catches were highest in late spring. However, presence of the largest sharks (>230 cm) coincided with peak tarpon abundance. When moving over deep open waters (areas of high shark abundance and high food availability) tarpon maintained relatively high ROM in directed lines until reaching shallow structurally-complex areas. At such locations, tarpon exhibited slow tortuous movements over relatively long time periods indicative of foraging. Tarpon periodically concentrated up rivers, where tracked bull sharks were absent. We propose that tarpon trade-off energetic costs of both food assimilation and osmoregulation to reduce predation risk by bull sharks.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Home range, residency and movements of Diplodus sargus and Diplodus vulgaris in a coastal lagoon: Connectivity between nursery and adult habitats [J].
Abecasis, David ;
Bentes, Luis ;
Erzini, Karim .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2009, 85 (04) :525-529
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SHARKS WORLD
[3]  
[Anonymous], BIOL MANAGEMENT WORL
[4]  
Ault J. S., 2010, PASSION TARPON, P266
[5]  
Ault J.S., 2008, Biology and management of the world tarpon and bonefish fisheries
[6]  
Ault JS, FISH RES IN PRESS
[7]   How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal's path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension? [J].
Benhamou, S .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 229 (02) :209-220
[8]  
Bernard Y., 2010, IMPROVING ARGOS DOPP
[9]   PATCH USE AS AN INDICATOR OF HABITAT PREFERENCE, PREDATION RISK, AND COMPETITION [J].
BROWN, JS .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1988, 22 (01) :37-47
[10]   Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation [J].
Brown, JS ;
Kotler, BP .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 7 (10) :999-1014