The Relevance of "Women's Work": Social Reproduction and Immaterial Labor in Digital Media

被引:91
作者
Jarrett, Kylie [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Ireland Maynooth, Ctr Media Studies, Maynooth, Kildare, Ireland
关键词
immaterial labor; affect; discipline; digital media; feminist theory; CO-CREATION;
D O I
10.1177/1527476413487607
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In the ongoing debates about the role of immaterial labor in digital media economics, the work of feminist researchers into affective labor performed in the homewomen's workhas barely featured. This article is an attempt to address this gap in the dominant framework for discussing consumer labor in digital contexts. It draws on feminist frameworks, particularly the work of Fortunati, in arguing that affective, immaterial labor has a variable and often indirect relationship to capitalist exchange. This indirect relationship allows the products of such work to retain their use-values while nevertheless remaining implicated in systems of exchange. This in turn draws attention to the immaterial product of reproductive labor, which is the social order itself, and the importance of the disciplining function of reproductive labor.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 29
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]   Co-creative labour [J].
Banks, John ;
Deuze, Mark .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CULTURAL STUDIES, 2009, 12 (05) :419-431
[22]   Co-creating games: a co-evolutionary analysis [J].
Banks, John ;
Potts, Jason .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2010, 12 (02) :253-270
[23]  
Benkler Y., 2006, The Wealth of Networks
[24]  
Berardi Franco., 2009, SOUL WORK ALIENATION
[25]  
Cameron Jenny., 2003, GENDER PLACE CULT, V10, P145, DOI [10.1080/0966369032000079569, DOI 10.1080/0966369032000079569]
[26]  
Chesher C, 2006, FIBRECULTURE J, V8
[27]  
Clough Patricia., 2007, EPHEMERA, V7, P60
[28]  
Cohen NicoleS., 2008, Deomocratic Communique, V22, P5
[29]  
Cote Mark., 2007, EPHEMERA, V7, P88, DOI DOI 10.13169/WORKORGALABOGLOB.8.1.0088
[30]   The other economy: A suggestion for a distinctively feminist economics [J].
Donath, S .
FEMINIST ECONOMICS, 2000, 6 (01) :115-123