Evaluation of the feasibility of using weekly paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer; a pre-post clinical trial

被引:1
作者
Ebrahimi, Sakineh [1 ]
Nazari, Seyed Saeed Hashemi [2 ]
Moghadam, Arash Dooghaie [2 ]
Haghighi, Shirin [3 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Loghman Hosp, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Taleghani Hosp, Dept Oncol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Ovarian neoplasm; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Antineoplastic agents; Paclitaxel; Carboplatin; PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY; PHASE-II TRIAL; GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; CARBOPLATIN; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA; CRITERIA; BURDEN;
D O I
10.34172/ipp.2021.09
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin regimen is as effective as the standard method for treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, it has less frequently been used as neoadjuvant therapy. Objectives: To reduce the side effects of typical every three-week chemotherapy and increase progression-free survival (PFS) rate, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using weekly paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods: This pre-post clinical trial was conducted on 14 patients with stage IIIC (8 patients) and IV (6 patients) advanced ovarian carcinoma. All the patients received the three courses of treatment and then underwent interval debulking surgery. After the surgery, patients received three or five courses based on their stages. Every neoadjuvant chemotherapy course consisted of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC=6) every 3 weeks. After every 21 days of treatment course, the patients were evaluated to investigate their response to treatment and side effects. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months. Results: The mean (SD) age of the patients was 64 +/- 8 years. After three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, one patient (7%) had a complete response and 13 patients (93%) had a partial response. During the treatment period, two patients (14%) developed anemia, one patient (7%) developed neutropenia, two patients (14%) developed thrombocytopenia, and six patients (43%) developed neuropathy. The median (interquartile range) of PFS was 13 months (9.5-16.25). Conclusion: The findings showed that a weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin regimen as neoadjuvant therapy could be effective in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. However, it is necessary to conduct multicenter studies with larger sample sizes.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Alcarraz C, 2015, J CLIN ONCOL, V33
[2]   Improved outcomes with dose-dense paclitaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma [J].
Becker, David A. ;
Thomas, Eric D. ;
Gilbert, Allison L. ;
Boone, Jonathan D. ;
Straughn, J. Michael, Jr. ;
Huh, Warner K. ;
Bevis, Kerri S. ;
Leath, Charles A., III ;
Alvarez, Ronald D. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 142 (01) :25-29
[3]   Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Bian, Ce ;
Yao, Kui ;
Li, Li ;
Yi, Tao ;
Zhao, Xia .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (01) :163-168
[4]   Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis [J].
Bristow, Robert E. ;
Chi, Dennis S. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 103 (03) :1070-1076
[5]   Tolerance of weekly metronomic paclitaxel and carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer patients who are unlikely to tolerate 3 weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin [J].
Dessai, S. B. ;
Chakraborty, S. ;
Babu, T. V. S. ;
Nayanar, S. ;
Bhattacharjee, A. ;
Jones, J. ;
Balasubramanian, S. ;
Patil, Vijay M. .
SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 5 (02) :63-+
[6]   2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004) [J].
du Bois, A ;
Quinn, M ;
Thigpen, T ;
Vermorken, J ;
Avall-Lundqvist, E ;
Bookman, M ;
Bowtell, D ;
Brady, M ;
Casado, A ;
Cervantes, A ;
Eisenhauer, E ;
Friedlaender, M ;
Fujiwara, K ;
Grenman, S ;
Guastalla, JP ;
Harper, P ;
Hogberg, T ;
Kaye, S ;
Kitchener, H ;
Kristensen, G ;
Mannel, R ;
Meier, W ;
Miller, B ;
Neijt, JP ;
Oza, A ;
Ozols, R ;
Parmar, M ;
Pecorelli, S ;
Pfisterer, J ;
Poveda, A ;
Provencher, D ;
Pujade-Lauraine, E ;
Randall, M ;
Rochon, J ;
Rustin, G ;
Sagae, S ;
Stehman, F ;
Stuart, G ;
Trimble, E ;
Vasey, P ;
Vergote, I ;
Verheijen, R ;
Wagner, U .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 :7-12
[7]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[8]   INTENSIVE SURGICAL AND CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER [J].
GRIFFITHS, CT ;
FULLER, AF .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1978, 58 (01) :131-142
[9]   Cancer statistics, 2007 [J].
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Siegel, Rebecca ;
Ward, Elizabeth ;
Murray, Taylor ;
Xu, Jiaquan ;
Thun, Michael J. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2007, 57 (01) :43-66
[10]   Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial [J].
Kehoe, Sean ;
Hook, Jane ;
Nankivell, Matthew ;
Jayson, Gordon C. ;
Kitchener, Henry ;
Lopes, Tito ;
Luesley, David ;
Perren, Timothy ;
Bannoo, Selina ;
Mascarenhas, Monica ;
Dobbs, Stephen ;
Essapen, Sharadah ;
Twigg, Jeremy ;
Herod, Jonathan ;
McCluggage, Glenn ;
Parmar, Mahesh ;
Swart, Ann-Marie .
LANCET, 2015, 386 (9990) :249-257