Reactivity to sorbitan sesquioleate affects reactivity to fragrance mix I

被引:15
作者
Geier, Johannes [1 ]
Schnuch, Axel [1 ]
Lessmann, Holger [1 ]
Uter, Wolfgang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Informat Network Dept Dermatol, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
fragrance allergy; fragrance mix; patch testing; sorbitan sesquioleate; ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS; PATCH TEST SERIES; BASE-LINE SERIES; INFORMATION NETWORK; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; OAK MOSS; CONSTITUENTS; RECOMMENDATION; EMULSIFIER; BEHALF;
D O I
10.1111/cod.12468
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
BackgroundFragrance mix I (FM I) and its single constituents contain 5% and 1% sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO), respectively. SSO is a rare sensitizer and a potential irritant. ObjectivesTo determine whether the outcome of the FM I breakdown test is affected by positive patch test reactivity to SSO. MethodsA retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology, 1998-2013, was performed. ResultsThe full FM I breakdown test including SSO was tested in 2952 patients. Of these, 154 (5.2%) had a positive patch test reaction to SSO 20% pet. and 2709 (91.8%) had a negative patch test reaction. Positive reactions to one or more of the single fragrances contained in the mix were significantly more common (82.5% versus 57.3%) in SSO-positive patients, who also had more multiple reactions than FM I-positive patients with negative SSO reactions (61.5% versus 21.3% patients with reactions to two or more fragrances). ConclusionsOur results indicate that reactivity to SSO markedly affects the outcome of patch testing with FM I and its single constituents. SSO must be an obligatory part of the full FM I breakdown test, and should ideally be included in the baseline series.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 304
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] Sorbitan sesquioleate as an allergen
    Orton, DI
    Shaw, S
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 44 (03) : 190 - 191
  • [32] Surveillance of contact allergies: methods and results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK)
    Schnuch, A.
    Geier, J.
    Lessmann, H.
    Arnold, R.
    Uter, W.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2012, 67 (07) : 847 - 857
  • [33] SCHNUCH A, 1993, DERMATOS BER UMWELT, V41, P176
  • [34] Schnuch A., 2002, EXOG DERMATOL, V1, P231, DOI 10.1159/000068797
  • [35] Performing patch testing with contact allergens
    Schnuch, Axel
    Aberer, Werner
    Agathos, Monika
    Becker, Detlef
    Brasch, Jochen
    Elsner, Peter
    Frosch, Peter J.
    Fuchs, Thomas
    Geier, Johannes
    Hillen, Uwe
    Loeffler, Harald
    Mahler, Vera
    Richter, Gerhard
    Szliska, Christiane
    [J]. JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2008, 6 (09): : 770 - 775
  • [36] Fragrance
    Storrs, Frances J.
    Belsito, Donald V.
    [J]. DERMATITIS, 2007, 18 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [37] Guidelines for the descriptive presentation and statistical analysis of contact allergy data
    Uter, W
    Schnuch, A
    Gefeller, O
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2004, 51 (02) : 47 - 56
  • [38] Uter W., 2005, DERMATOL BERUF UMWEL, V53, P107
  • [39] Fragrance mix I: TRUE Test® versus pet.-based patch test
    Uter, Wolfgang
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2015, 72 (04) : 256 - 258
  • [40] A review of 241 subjects who were patch tested twice: could fragrance mix I cause active sensitization?
    White, J. M. L.
    McFadden, J. P.
    White, I. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2008, 158 (03) : 518 - 521