The use of the Community Earth System Model in human dimensions climate research and applications

被引:0
作者
Laidlaw, Emily K. [1 ,2 ]
O'Neill, Brian C. [1 ,3 ]
Harp, Ryan D. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Lab, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[2] Laidlaw Sci LLC, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Univ Denver, Josef Korbel Sch Int Studies, Denver, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[5] Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CESM; earth system models; human dimensions; IMPACTS; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/wcc.582
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Earth system models (ESMs) are the primary tool used to understand and project changes to the climate system. ESM projections underpin analyses of human dimensions of the climate issue, yet little is known about how ESMs are used in human dimensions research. Such foundational information is necessary for future critical assessments of ESMs. We review applications of a leading ESM, the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Earth System Model (CESM), to human dimensions topics since 2004. We find that this research has grown substantially over this period, twice as fast as CESM research overall. Although many studies have primarily addressed long-term impacts on physical systems with societal relevance, applications to managed, societal, and ecological systems have grown quickly and now make up more than half of CESM human dimensions work. CESM applications focused nearly equally on global and regional analyses, most often using multimodel ensembles, although the use of single simulations remains prevalent. Downscaling and bias correction of output was infrequent and most common for regional studies. U.S.-based, university-affiliated authors primarily drove human dimensions work using CESM, with only 12% of authors based at NCAR. Our findings identify important questions that warrant further investigation, such as reasons for the infrequent use of downscaling and bias correction techniques; motivations to continue to use older model versions after newer model versions have been released; and model development needs for improved human dimensions applications. Additionally, our synthesis provides a baseline and framework that enables continued tracking of CESM and other ESMs. This article is categorized under: Assessing Impacts of Climate Change > Evaluating Future Impacts of Climate Change
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Simulating biogenic volatile organic compound emissions in the Community Climate System Model
    Levis, S
    Wiedinmyer, C
    Bonan, GB
    Guenther, A
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D21)
  • [42] An online ensemble coupled data assimilation capability for the Community Earth System Model: system design and evaluation
    Sun, Jingzhe
    Jiang, Yingjing
    Zhang, Shaoqing
    Zhang, Weimin
    Lu, Lv
    Liu, Guangliang
    Chen, Yuhu
    Xing, Xiang
    Lin, Xiaopei
    Wu, Lixin
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 15 (12) : 4805 - 4830
  • [43] Modeling the mid-piacenzian warm climate using the water isotope-enabled Community Earth System Model (iCESM1.2-ITPCAS)
    Sun, Yong
    Ding, Lin
    Su, Baohuang
    Dowsett, Harry
    Wu, Haibin
    Hu, Jun
    Stepanek, Christian
    Xiong, Zhongyu
    Yuan, Xiayu
    Ramstein, Gilles
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2024, 62 (08) : 7741 - 7761
  • [44] Sensitivity of ENSO Variability to Pacific Freshwater Flux Adjustment in the Community Earth System Model
    Kang Xianbiao
    Huang Ronghui
    Wang Zhanggui
    Zhang Rong-Hua
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2014, 31 (05) : 1009 - 1021
  • [45] Clusters of Regional Precipitation Seasonality Change in the Community Earth System Model, Version 2
    Swenson, Leif M.
    Ullrich, Paul A.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2024, 37 (21) : 5465 - 5482
  • [46] Sensitivity of ENSO Variability to Pacific Freshwater Flux Adjustment in the Community Earth System Model
    KANG Xianbiao
    HUANG Ronghui
    WANG Zhanggui
    ZHANG Rong-Hua
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2014, 31 (05) : 1009 - 1021
  • [47] Response of air-sea carbon fluxes and climate to orbital forcing changes in the Community Climate System Model
    Jochum, M.
    Peacock, S.
    Moore, K.
    Lindsay, K.
    PALEOCEANOGRAPHY, 2010, 25
  • [48] Contrasting Local versus Regional Effects of Land-Use-Change-Induced Heterogeneity on Historical Climate: Analysis with the GFDL Earth System Model
    Malyshev, Sergey
    Shevliakova, Elena
    Stouffer, Ronald J.
    Pacala, Stephen W.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2015, 28 (13) : 5448 - 5469
  • [49] Sensitivity of ENSO variability to Pacific freshwater flux adjustment in the Community Earth System Model
    Xianbiao Kang
    Ronghui Huang
    Zhanggui Wang
    Rong-Hua Zhang
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2014, 31 : 1009 - 1021
  • [50] Quantifying the role of fire in the Earth system - Part 1: Improved global fire modeling in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1)
    Li, F.
    Levis, S.
    Ward, D. S.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2013, 10 (04) : 2293 - 2314