The use of the Community Earth System Model in human dimensions climate research and applications

被引:0
|
作者
Laidlaw, Emily K. [1 ,2 ]
O'Neill, Brian C. [1 ,3 ]
Harp, Ryan D. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Lab, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[2] Laidlaw Sci LLC, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Univ Denver, Josef Korbel Sch Int Studies, Denver, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[5] Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CESM; earth system models; human dimensions; IMPACTS; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/wcc.582
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Earth system models (ESMs) are the primary tool used to understand and project changes to the climate system. ESM projections underpin analyses of human dimensions of the climate issue, yet little is known about how ESMs are used in human dimensions research. Such foundational information is necessary for future critical assessments of ESMs. We review applications of a leading ESM, the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Earth System Model (CESM), to human dimensions topics since 2004. We find that this research has grown substantially over this period, twice as fast as CESM research overall. Although many studies have primarily addressed long-term impacts on physical systems with societal relevance, applications to managed, societal, and ecological systems have grown quickly and now make up more than half of CESM human dimensions work. CESM applications focused nearly equally on global and regional analyses, most often using multimodel ensembles, although the use of single simulations remains prevalent. Downscaling and bias correction of output was infrequent and most common for regional studies. U.S.-based, university-affiliated authors primarily drove human dimensions work using CESM, with only 12% of authors based at NCAR. Our findings identify important questions that warrant further investigation, such as reasons for the infrequent use of downscaling and bias correction techniques; motivations to continue to use older model versions after newer model versions have been released; and model development needs for improved human dimensions applications. Additionally, our synthesis provides a baseline and framework that enables continued tracking of CESM and other ESMs. This article is categorized under: Assessing Impacts of Climate Change > Evaluating Future Impacts of Climate Change
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Primary production response to seasonal-scale extremes in the Bering Sea simulated by the Community Earth System Model, version 1
    Walston, J. M.
    Gibson, G. A.
    Walsh, J. E.
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS, 2015, 148 : 285 - 298
  • [22] An improved dust emission model - Part 2: Evaluation in the Community Earth System Model, with implications for the use of dust source functions
    Kok, J. F.
    Albani, S.
    Mahowald, N. M.
    Ward, D. S.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2014, 14 (23) : 13043 - 13061
  • [23] Impacts of the representation of riverine freshwater input in the community earth system model
    Tseng, Yu-heng
    Bryan, Frank O.
    Whitney, Michael M.
    OCEAN MODELLING, 2016, 105 : 71 - 86
  • [24] CESMTuner: An Auto-Tuning Framework for the Community Earth System Model
    Ding Nan
    Xue Wei
    Ji Xu
    Xu Haoyu
    Song Zhenya
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, 2014 IEEE 6TH INTL SYMP ON CYBERSPACE SAFETY AND SECURITY, 2014 IEEE 11TH INTL CONF ON EMBEDDED SOFTWARE AND SYST (HPCC,CSS,ICESS), 2014, : 282 - 289
  • [25] Runtime Tracing of the Community Earth System Model: Feasibility Study and Benefits
    Domke, Jens
    Wang, Dali
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, ICCS 2012, 2012, 9 : 1950 - 1958
  • [26] Desert dust and anthropogenic aerosol interactions in the Community Climate System Model coupled-carbon-climate model
    Mahowald, N.
    Lindsay, K.
    Rothenberg, D.
    Doney, S. C.
    Moore, J. K.
    Thornton, P.
    Randerson, J. T.
    Jones, C. D.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2011, 8 (02) : 387 - 414
  • [27] The Impact of Model Resolution on the Southern Hemisphere in Community Climate System Model Version 4 Idealized Climate Simulations
    Daher, Houraa
    Kirtman, Ben P.
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (11)
  • [28] The Physical Climate at Global Warming Thresholds as Seen in the UK Earth System Model
    Swaminathan, Ranjini
    Parker, Robert J.
    Jones, Colin G.
    Allan, Richard P.
    Quaife, Tristan
    Kelley, Douglas I.
    de Mora, Lee
    Walton, Jeremy
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2022, 35 (01) : 29 - 48
  • [29] Improving the representation of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in climate models: impact of a new parameterization for the Community Earth System Model (CESM)
    Navarro, Andres
    Moreno, Raul
    Tapiador, Francisco J.
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2018, 9 (03) : 1045 - 1062
  • [30] Explaining and Predicting Earth System Change: A World Climate Research Programme Call to Action
    Findell, Kirsten L.
    Sutton, Rowan
    Caltabiano, Nico
    Brookshaw, Anca
    Heimbach, Patrick
    Kimoto, Masahide
    Osprey, Scott
    Smith, Doug
    Risbey, James S.
    Wang, Zhuo
    Cheng, Lijing
    Diaz, Leandro B.
    Donat, Markus G.
    Ek, Michael
    Lee, June-Yi
    Minobe, Shoshiro
    Rusticucci, Matilde
    Vitart, Frederic
    Wang, Lin
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 104 (01) : E325 - E339