Cougar predation and population growth of sympatric mule deer and white-tailed deer

被引:66
作者
Robinson, HS [1 ]
Wielgus, RB
Gwilliam, JC
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Large Carnivore Conservat Lab, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Compensat Program, Nelson, BC V1L 5P5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1139/Z02-025
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) populations throughout the west appear to be declining, whereas white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations are increasing. We compared abundance, number of fetuses per female (maternity rate), recruitment, and cause-specific adult (greater than or equal to1 year old) mortality rate for sympatric mule deer and white-tailed deer in south-central British Columbia to assess population growth for each species. White-tailed deer were three times more abundant (908 +/- 152) than mule deer (336 +/- 122) (mean +/- 1 SE). Fetal rates of white-tailed deer (1.83) were similar to those of mule deer (1.78). There was no statistically significant difference in recruitment of white-tailed deer (56 fawns : 100 does) and mule deer (38 fawns : 100 does). The annual survival rate for adult white-tailed deer (S-WT = 0.81) was significantly higher than that for mule deer (S-MD = 0.72). The main cause of mortality in both populations was cougar predation. The lower mule deer survival rate could be directly linked to a higher predation rate (0.17) than for white-tailed deer (0.09). The finite growth rate (lambda) was 0.88 for mule deer and 1.02 for white-tailed deer. The disparate survival and predation rates are consistent with the apparent-competition hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 568
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
[41]   PREDICTING WHITE-TAILED DEER HABITAT USE IN NORTHERN IDAHO [J].
PAULEY, GR ;
PEEK, JM ;
ZAGER, P .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1993, 57 (04) :904-913
[42]   PREDATION MODELS FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PREY SPECIES [J].
PECH, RP ;
SINCLAIR, ARE ;
NEWSOME, AE .
WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 1995, 22 (01) :55-64
[43]  
Pierce BM, 2000, ECOLOGY, V81, P1533
[44]   SURVIVAL ANALYSIS IN TELEMETRY STUDIES - THE STAGGERED ENTRY DESIGN [J].
POLLOCK, KH ;
WINTERSTEIN, SR ;
BUNCK, CM ;
CURTIS, PD .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1989, 53 (01) :7-15
[45]  
Roffe T. J., 1996, RES MANAGEMENT TECHN, P324
[46]  
Roseberry JL, 1998, WILDLIFE SOC B, V26, P252
[47]   ESTIMATION OF WILDLIFE POPULATION RATIOS INCORPORATING SURVEY DESIGN AND VISIBILITY BIAS [J].
SAMUEL, MD ;
STEINHORST, RK ;
GARTON, EO ;
UNSWORTH, JW .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1992, 56 (04) :718-725
[48]   VISIBILITY BIAS DURING AERIAL SURVEYS OF ELK IN NORTHCENTRAL IDAHO [J].
SAMUEL, MD ;
GARTON, EO ;
SCHLEGEL, MW ;
CARSON, RG .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1987, 51 (03) :622-630
[49]   GENERALIZED PROCEDURES FOR TESTING HYPOTHESES ABOUT SURVIVAL OR RECOVERY RATES [J].
SAUER, JR ;
WILLIAMS, BK .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1989, 53 (01) :137-142
[50]   FACTORS LIMITING WOODLAND CARIBOU POPULATIONS AND THEIR INTERRELATIONSHIPS WITH WOLVES AND MOOSE IN SOUTHEASTERN BRITISH-COLUMBIA [J].
SEIP, DR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1992, 70 (08) :1494-1503