Cognitive Styles and Visual Quality

被引:0
|
作者
Jumisko-Pyykko, Satu [1 ]
Strohmeier, Dominik [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Technol, Dept Pervas Comp, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
来源
MULTIMEDIA CONTENT AND MOBILE DEVICES | 2013年 / 8667卷
关键词
MULTIMEDIA; EXPERT; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1117/12.2009644
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Assessors are the main measurement instruments in subjective quality evaluation studies. Although the perceptual abilities and constrains are influenced by multiple demographic and psychographic factors, they are typically disregarded as a part of quality assessment. Cognitive styles refer to individual's consistent approaches to organize and represent information. Goal of this study is to explore the impact of cognitive styles on visual quality requirements. The data collection is conducted using the Style of Processing (SOP) questionnaire in three video quality experiments with a total of 72 participants. All participants were categorized into four groups according to sensorial preferences in information processing (visual, verbal, bimodal - high processing, and bimodal - low processing). The experiments were conducted in controlled circumstances when varying depth in video quality with several content types on the mobile device. The results show variation in quality requirements between these groups. Finally, these results also indicate that sensorial processing styles are essential to explore for sample characterization in quality evaluation experiments and for exploring more user-aware quality adjustments in future services and products.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How Visual Displays Affect Cognitive Processing
    McCrudden, Matthew T.
    Rapp, David N.
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2017, 29 (03) : 623 - 639
  • [42] Independent sources of anisotropy in visual orientation representation: a visual and a cognitive oblique effect
    Balikou, Panagiota
    Gourtzelidis, Pavlos
    Mantas, Asimakis
    Moutoussis, Konstantinos
    Evdokimidis, Ioannis
    Smyrnis, Nikolaos
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2015, 233 (11) : 3097 - 3108
  • [43] Visual syntax does matter: improving the cognitive effectiveness of the i* visual notation
    Moody, Daniel L.
    Heymans, Patrick
    Matulevicius, Raimundas
    REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING, 2010, 15 (02) : 141 - 175
  • [44] Testing acoustic voice quality classification across languages and speech styles
    Braun, Bettina
    Dehe, Nicole
    Einfeldt, Marieke
    Wochner, Daniela
    Zahner-Ritter, Katharina
    INTERSPEECH 2021, 2021, : 3920 - 3924
  • [45] Cognitive styles and search engine preferences Field dependence/independence vs holism/serialism
    Clewley, Natalie
    Chen, Sherry Y.
    Liu, Xiaohui
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2010, 66 (04) : 585 - 603
  • [46] Visual and cognitive processes contribute to age-related improvements in visual selective attention
    Lynn, Andrew
    Maule, John
    Amso, Dima
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 95 (02) : 391 - 408
  • [47] Visual quality beyond artifact visibility
    Redi, Judith A.
    HUMAN VISION AND ELECTRONIC IMAGING XVIII, 2013, 8651
  • [48] Effects of Motion in the Far Peripheral Visual Field on Cognitive Test Performance and Cognitive Load
    Bevilacqua, Andy
    Paas, Fred
    Krigbaum, Genomary
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2016, 122 (02) : 452 - 469
  • [49] Detecting cognitive hacking in visual inspection with physiological measurements
    Huang, Wenyan
    Chen, Xiaoyu
    Jin, Ran
    Lau, Nathan
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2020, 84
  • [50] Evaluation of a Visual Cognitive Style in Autism: A Cluster Analysis
    Bled, Clara
    Guillon, Q.
    Mottron, L.
    Soulieres, I.
    Bouvet, L.
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2024,