Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: An examination of differences in accessibility

被引:27
作者
Unsworth, Nash [1 ]
Spillers, Gregory J. [1 ]
Brewer, Gene A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
Working memory; Individual differences; Retrieval; LATENT-VARIABLE ANALYSIS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; FLUID INTELLIGENCE; EPISODIC RECALL; DYNAMICS; SPAN; ATTENTION; INFORMATION; COGNITION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1080/17470218.2012.690438
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In two experiments, the locus of individual differences in working memory capacity and long-term memory recall was examined. Participants performed categorical cued and free recall tasks, and individual differences in the dynamics of recall were interpreted in terms of a hierarchical-search framework. The results from this study are in accordance with recent theorizing suggesting a strong relation between working memory capacity and retrieval from long-term memory. Furthermore, the results also indicate that individual differences in categorical recall are partially due to differences in accessibility. In terms of accessibility of target information, two important factors drive the difference between high- and low-working-memory-capacity participants. Low-working-memory-capacity participants fail to utilize appropriate retrieval strategies to access cues, and they also have difficulty resolving cue overload. Thus, when low-working-memory-capacity participants were given specific cues that activated a smaller set of potential targets, their recall performance was the same as that of high-working-memory-capacity participants.
引用
收藏
页码:2397 / 2410
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MODELS WORKING MEMOR, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Canadian Psychology
[3]   Why does working memory span predict complex cognition? Testing the strategy affordance hypothesis [J].
Bailey, Heather ;
Dunlosky, John ;
Kane, Michael J. .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2008, 36 (08) :1383-1390
[4]   WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY AS LONG-TERM-MEMORY ACTIVATION - AN INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES APPROACH [J].
CANTOR, J ;
ENGLE, RW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (05) :1101-1114
[5]   SOME-OR-NONE CHARACTERISTICS OF CODING BEHAVIOR [J].
COHEN, BH .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1966, 5 (02) :182-&
[6]   Sources of individual differences in working memory: Contributions of strategy to capacity [J].
Cokely, Edward T. ;
Kelley, Colleen M. ;
Gilchrist, Amanda L. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (06) :991-997
[7]   A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence [J].
Conway, ARA ;
Cowan, N ;
Bunting, MF ;
Therriault, DJ ;
Minkoff, SRB .
INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 30 (02) :163-183
[8]   Children's working-memory processes: A response-timing analysis [J].
Cowan, N ;
Towse, JN ;
Hamilton, Z ;
Saults, JS ;
Elliott, EM ;
Lacey, JF ;
Moreno, MV ;
Hitch, GJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2003, 132 (01) :113-132
[9]   PATTERNS OF MEMORY LOSS IN 3 ELDERLY SAMPLES [J].
CRAIK, FIM ;
BYRD, M ;
SWANSON, JM .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1987, 2 (01) :79-86
[10]  
DELLAROCCHETTA AI, 1993, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V31, P503