Elective irradiation of pelvic lymph nodes during postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy

被引:45
作者
Moghanaki, Drew [1 ,2 ]
Koontz, Bridget F. [3 ]
Karlin, Jeremy D. [1 ]
Wan, Wen [4 ]
Mukhopadhay, Nitai [4 ]
Hagan, Michael P. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Anscher, Mitchell S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Richmond, VA 23291 USA
[2] Hunter Holmes McGuire Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Radiat Oncol Serv, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Durham, NC USA
[4] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Biostat, Richmond, VA 23291 USA
[5] US Dept Vet Affairs, Natl Radiat Oncol Program, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
prostate cancer; radiotherapy; lymph nodes; salvage radiotherapy; elective lymph node; whole pelvis; pelvic lymph nodes; prostatectomy; postprostatectomy; biochemical relapse; CONFORMAL RADIATION-THERAPY; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; RELAPSE-FREE SURVIVAL; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PATHOLOGICAL STAGE; CANCER; RISK; ADENOCARCINOMA; FAILURE; SCORE;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.27712
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Success rates with salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in men who have a postprostatectomy biochemical relapse are suboptimal. One treatment-intensification strategy includes elective irradiation of the pelvic lymph nodes with whole pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT). METHODS: An inter-institutional retrospective cohort study compared outcomes for patients who received SRT at 2 separate academic institutions with disparate treatment paradigms: almost exclusively favoring WPRT (n = 112) versus limiting treatment to the prostate bed (PBRT) (n = 135). Patients were excluded if they had lymph node involvement or if they received androgen-deprivation therapy. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: In total, 247 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 4 years. The pre-SRT prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; P < .0001) and a Gleason score of 8 to 10 (adjusted HR, 3.21; P < .0001) were identified as independent predictors of increased risk of biochemical PSA progression after SRT. However, WPRT was not independently associated with biochemical progression-free survival in the multivariate model (adjusted HR, 0.79; P = .20). Neither low-risk patients nor high-risk patients (defined a priori by a preoperative PSA level =20 ng/mL, a pathologic Gleason score between 8 and 10, or pathologic T3 tumor classification) benefited from WPRT. Overall survival was similar between treatment groups. When restricting the analysis to patients with pre-SRT PSA levels =0.4 ng/mL (n = 139), WPRT was independently associated with a 53% reduction in the risk of biochemical progression (adjusted HR, 0.47; P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: WPRT did not improve outcomes among the entire group but was independently associated with improved biochemical control among patients with pre-SRT PSA levels =0.4 ng/mL. Cancer 2013. (c) 2012 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 60
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-institutional Evaluation of Elective Nodal Irradiation and/or Androgen Deprivation Therapy with Postprostatectomy Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
    Ramey, Stephen J.
    Agrawal, Shree
    Abramowitz, Matthew C.
    Moghanaki, Drew
    Pisansky, Thomas M.
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Hearn, Jason W. D.
    Koontz, Bridget F.
    Liauw, Stanley L.
    Pollack, Alan
    Anscher, Mitchell S.
    Den, Robert B.
    Stephans, Kevin L.
    Zietman, Anthony L.
    Lee, W. Robert
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Tendulkar, Rahul D.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (01) : 99 - 106
  • [2] When is Elective Pelvic Lymph Node Irradiation Indicated in Definitive Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer?
    Mendenhall, William M.
    Hoppe, Bradford S.
    Nichols, R. Charles
    Henderson, Randal H.
    Mendenhall, Nancy P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2013, 36 (06): : 644 - 647
  • [3] Elective pelvic versus prostate bed-only salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy
    Song, Changhoon
    Kang, Hyun-Cheol
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    Eom, Keun-Yong
    Kim, In Ah
    Chung, Jin-Beom
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2015, 191 (10) : 801 - 809
  • [4] Irradiation of the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes with an adaptive algorithm
    Hwang, A. B.
    Chen, J.
    Nguyen, T. B.
    Gottschalk, A. G.
    Roach, M. R., III
    Pouliot, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (02) : 1119 - 1124
  • [5] Hypofractionated helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the prostate bed after prostatectomy with or without the pelvic lymph nodes - the PRIAMOS trial
    Krause, Sonja
    Sterzing, Florian
    Neuhof, Dirk
    Edler, Lutz
    Debus, Juergen
    Herfarth, Klaus
    BMC CANCER, 2012, 12
  • [6] Reduction of PTV margins for elective pelvic lymph nodes in online adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients
    Brennsaeter, John Alfred
    Dahle, Tordis Johnsen
    Moi, Jannicke Nokling
    Svanberg, Ingvild Forsvoll
    Haaland, Gry Sandvik
    Pilskog, Sara
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2023, 62 (10) : 1208 - 1214
  • [7] Early Hypofractionated Salvage Radiotherapy for Postprostatectomy Biochemical Recurrence
    Kruser, Tim J.
    Jarrard, David F.
    Graf, Andrew K.
    Hedican, Sean P.
    Paolone, David R.
    Wegenke, John D.
    Liu, Glenn
    Geye, Heather M.
    Ritter, Mark A.
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (12) : 2629 - 2636
  • [8] When Less is More for Postprostatectomy Salvage Radiotherapy
    Kamran, Sophia C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (03) : 316 - 318
  • [9] MRI visibility and displacement of elective lymph nodes during radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients
    Reinders, Floris C. J.
    Stijnman, Peter R. S.
    de Ridder, Mischa
    Doornaert, Patricia A. H.
    Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J.
    Philippens, Marielle E. P.
    FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 2
  • [10] Comparison of adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy policies for postprostatectomy radiotherapy
    Hagan, M
    Zlotecki, R
    Medina, C
    Tercilla, O
    Rivera, I
    Wajsman, Z
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (02): : 329 - 340