Estimating Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer A Cohort Study

被引:148
|
作者
Veronesi, Giulia [1 ]
Maisonneuve, Patrick
Bellomi, Massimo
Rampinelli, Cristiano
Durli, Iara
Bertolotti, Raffaella
Spaggiari, Lorenzo
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Div Thorac Surg, I-20141 Milan, Italy
关键词
HIGH-RISK INDIVIDUALS; NATURAL-HISTORY; GROWTH-RATES; CT; STAGE; TRIAL; CARCINOMA; NODULES; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Lung cancer screening may detect cancer that will never become symptomatic (overdiagnosis), leading to overtreatment. Changes in size on sequential low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, expressed as volume-doubling time (VDT), may help to distinguish aggressive cancer from cases that are unlikely to become symptomatic. Objective: To assess VDT for screening-detected lung cancer as an indicator of overdiagnosis. Design: Retrospective estimation of the VDT of cancer detected in a prospective LDCT screening cohort. Setting: Nonrandomized, single-center screening study involving persons at high risk for lung cancer enrolled between 2004 and 2005 who received LDCT annually for 5 years. Patients: 175 study patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer. Measurements: VDT was measured on LDCT and classified as fast-growing (<400 days), slow-growing (between 400 and 599 days), or indolent (>= 600 days). Results: Fifty-five cases of cancer were diagnosed at baseline, and 120 were diagnosed subsequently. Of the latter group, 19 cases (15.8%) were new (not visible on previous scans) and fast-growing (median VDT, 52 days); 101 (84.2%) were progressive, including 70 (58.3%) fast-growing and 31 (25.8%) slow-growing (15.0%) or indolent (10.8%) cases. Lung cancer-specific mortality was significantly higher (9.2% per year) in patients with new compared with slow-growing or indolent (0.9% per year) cancer. Sixty percent of fast-growing progressive cancer and 45% of new cancer were stage I, for which survival was good. Limitations: This is a retrospective study. Volume-doubling time can only indicate overdiagnosis and was estimated for new cancer from 1 measurement (a diameter of 2 mm assumed the previous year). Conclusion: Slow-growing or indolent cancer comprised approximately 25% of incident cases, many of which may have been overdiagnosed. To limit overtreatment in these cases, minimally invasive limited resection and nonsurgical treatments should be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:776 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Shedding Light on Incidental Findings on Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening Chest Computed Tomography
    Chung, Jonathan H.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2017, 14 (09) : 1393 - 1394
  • [42] Effect of prior pulmonary TB on low-dose computed tomography during lung cancer screening
    Damaraju, V.
    Singh, N.
    Garg, M.
    Kathirvel, S.
    Basher, R. K.
    Grover, S.
    Kalra, N.
    Prasad, K. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2023, 27 (03) : 223 - 225
  • [43] Radiation Exposure to Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening: Should We Be Concerned?
    Pozzessere, Chiara
    von Garnier, Christophe
    Beigelman-Aubry, Catherine
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 9 (01) : 166 - 177
  • [44] Lung cancer screening with low dose computed tomography
    Baldwin, David R.
    Hansell, David M.
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Field, John K.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [45] Opportunistic lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in National Cancer Center of China: The first 14 years' experience
    Tang, Wei
    Liu, Li
    Huang, Yao
    Zhao, Shijun
    Wang, Jianwei
    Liang, Min
    Jin, Yujing
    Zhou, Lina
    Liu, Ying
    Tang, Yanyan
    Xu, Zhijian
    Zhang, Kai
    Tan, Fengwei
    Bi, Nan
    Wang, Zhijie
    Wang, Fei
    Li, Ni
    Wu, Ning
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (03):
  • [46] Nationwide lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: implementation and first results of the HUNCHEST screening program
    Kerpel-Fronius, Anna
    Monostori, Zsuzsanna
    Kovacs, Gabor
    Ostoros, Gyula
    Horvath, Istvan
    Solymosi, Diana
    Pipek, Orsolya
    Szatmari, Ferenc
    Kovacs, Anita
    Markoczy, Zsolt
    Rojko, Livia
    Renyi-Vamos, Ferenc
    Hoetzenecker, Konrad
    Bogos, Krisztina
    Megyesfalvi, Zsolt
    Dome, Balazs
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (07) : 4457 - 4467
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in heavy smokers: a microsimulation modelling study
    Du, Yihui
    Sidorenkov, Grigory
    Heuvelmans, Marjolein A.
    Groen, Harry J. M.
    Vermeulen, Karin M.
    Greuter, Marcel J. W.
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 135 : 121 - 129
  • [48] Efficacy of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: the current state of evidence of mortality reduction
    Sagawa, Motoyasu
    Sugawara, Takafumi
    Ishibashi, Naoya
    Koyanagi, Akira
    Kondo, Takashi
    Tabata, Toshiharu
    SURGERY TODAY, 2017, 47 (07) : 783 - 788
  • [49] The National Lung Screening Trial. A Before and After in Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Gorospe, Luis
    ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, 2013, 49 (10): : 453 - +
  • [50] Does the evidence support the implementation of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography?
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 12 (04) : 257 - 260